EFTA01361047.pdf

Gave no details on the following- • A DEPOSIT was also received during the reviewing period. ??? RESPONSES: I stated in my write up a CHECK was received, as well as provide the person who sent the check to the client • LAUREL, INC, ?? • What does this mean? "BNP PARIBAS IBAN: SSB REF# It tells me nothing. Should indicate $5,535.84 wire to Cabinet Experton SPRL referencing invoices or July - Sept * RESPONSES: My write up indicated Disbursement of Funds - I have only provided the financial institution information in the past with no issues and ou have a roved • SOCIETE GENERALE SSB IBAN: ?? Should indicate FFC to Mlle in France RESPONSES: My write up indicated Disbursement of Funds I have only provided the financial Institution information in the past with no issues and ou have approved • SWEDBANK SSB IBAN: ??? RESPONSES: My write up indicated Disbursement of funds I have only provided the financial institution information in the past with no issues and you have approved • CREDIT LYONNAIS SSB REF# IBAN: SORT CODE: RIB CODE 17 ?? RESPONSES: My write up indicated Distribution of funds I have only provided the financial institution information in the past with no issues and you have approved Once again, the timing of your communication is extremely alarming — you have always approved my Jeffery Epstein cases in this same write up manner in the past with no issues See but today, you are highlighting imperfections and changes to the process. Which brings me back to the retaliation theory. Agreed- Case -- complete error on my part — uploaded the incomplete case summary that did not included a list of sample checks. Case — No Summary was attached - As advised, not sure what transpired large case items were uploaded and my case write up did not upload properly. Once advised, case write up was immediately attached. Pending your approval Case - No Summary was attached - As advised, not sure what transpired large case items were uploaded and my case write up did not upload properly. Once advised, case write up was immediately attached. Pending your approval From: Cherie Quigley Sent: Thursday, January 07, 2016 3:35 PM To: Tammy McFadden Subject: RE: PRIME CASES - RETURNS/COMMENTS [C] Classification: Confidential I don't review cases every day and 2 of the S that were returned had no summary attached. It just happened to be a day that I was reviewing cases. Case - the Profile was incorrect, for which you stated but didn't update Cases - You indicated that you uploaded the incomplete case summary CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUANT TO FED. R. CRIM. P. 6(e) DB-SDNY-0049849 CONFIDENTIAL SDNY_GM_00196033 EFTA01361047