EFTA01019351
EFTA01019364 DataSet-9
EFTA01019366

EFTA01019364.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 277 words document
V16 P17 D5 P19
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (277 words)
From: "Jeffrey E." <[email protected]> To: "Barry J. Cohen" Subject: Re: 000's Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 20:09:29 +0000 i did not suggest you use the 000 method. Im sorry but i dont have the time . do you think if you filed a gift tax return and left everything blank the statue would run? On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 4:03 PM, Barry J. Cohen > wrote: John Cook at EY said they would not sign a return that uses the 000s method. They said that there are too many footing problems. Numbers won't tie to K-1s, W-2s, 1099s, etc. Also, if you only use it on part of the return, the various numbers on the return would not match internally. He also pointed out that this method effectively truncates numbers; though I'm not sure what rounding rules you use. E.g., 101,499 become 101? What happens to the other $499? Joe V likes the idea of putting in 0's instead of blanks. He says he uses "none". He did not understand why this would affect the statute of limitations. Barry J. Cohen I Elysium Management, LLC I please note The information contained in this communication is confidential, may be attorney-client privileged, may constitute inside information, and is intended only for the use of the addressee. It is the property of JEE Unauthorized use, disclosure or copying of this communication or any part thereof is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by return e-mail or by e-mail to [email protected], and EFTA01019364 destroy this communication and all copies thereof, including all attachments. copyright -all rights reserved EFTA01019365
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
990842703a2e6c6b826f8d98fe9bf509ec1fe34e74e403a5d4a4d76f043c86e7
Bates Number
EFTA01019364
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!