EFTA00608284.pdf

United States District Court FILED BY D.C. Southern District of Florida OCT 2 1 2016 CLE STEVEN uM. LAr si;t0 CRT.E .s. 01ST. S.D. OF FLA. FT. LAUD. Plaintiff, Case No.: 9:16-mc-81608-DMM Underlying Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS (Southern District of New York) (Sweet, J.) v . Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. PLAINTIFF'S SEALED MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1(0(2) Plaintiff by and through her undersigned counsel, respectfully submits this Sealed Motion to Exceed Page Limit pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(cX2) for her Reply brief due to the complexity of the issues raised in Motion to Compel the Production of Documents and Testimony from Jeffrey Epstein, and because the Reply brief must set forth certain questions posed to Jeffrey Epstein at his deposition, requiring excess pages. For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, respectfully requests that this Court allow her to exceed the page limit in her Reply brief pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(cX2) so as to address all of the issues currently before this Court. Dated: October 21, 2016 Respectfully Submitted, BOLES, SCHILLER & FI R LLP By: 1 EFTA00608284 Sigrid McCawley Meredith Schultz Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP David Boies Boics Schiller & Flexner LLP Bradley J. Edwards FARMER, JAFFE, WEISSING, EDWARDS, FISTOS & LEHRMAN, P.L. 2 EFTA00608285  CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on the 21th day of September, 2016,1 served the foregoing document this day on the individuals identified below via email: Laura A. Menninger, Esq. Jeffrey Pagliuca, Esq. HADDON, MORGAN & FOREMAN, P.C. Counselfor Ghislaine Maxwell Jack Alan Goldberger Atterbu , Goldberger & Weiss, P.A. Counselfor Jeffrey Epstein McCawl 3 EFTA00608286  United States District Court Southern District of Florida Plaintiff, Case No.: 9: I 6-mc-81608-DMM Underlying Case No • 15-cv-07433-RWS (Southern District of New York) (Sweet, J.) v. Jeffrey Epstein, Defendant. I 'PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S SEALED MOTION TO EXCEED PAGE LIMIT PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7.1(c)(2) THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon Plaintiff's Sealed Motion to Exceed Page Limit Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c)(2) filed on October 21, 2016. For good cause shown, Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED: Plaintiff's Reply brief may exceed the page limit pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(cX2). DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers in West Palm Beach, FL, this day of Donald M. Middlebrooks UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 EFTA00608287