EFTA01614019.pdf

Platform: iMessage Timezone: UTC+0000 • L Lawrence 2018/08/05 Lawrence I think you can release any and all you received . Before they do 12:00:36 am • The dean has written me a curt reply to my last email to him saying that the other investigation's complainant is the university and therefore the other university report will not be released to anyone. Just FYI. L 12:02:32 am Lawrence but you are free to release . 12:02:56 am • Thoughts on the piece, which has already changed, would be good over the next few days. L 12:03:05 am Again the dean said why don't you just read the rules 12:03:09 am • EFTA01614019  Lawrence Yes. That is a good point. (Not about the dean. Your earlier point. ). Re the dean. He was making it clear that one investigation went to outside complainant but the other has no complainant, which is interesting. L 12:04:18 am I think the photo should start the piece. Ask for sunshine. . that is strong. I thought that the ois said they didn't believe you photobombed it. Add looking the student up and down, talking about strip clubs. Show the drawing of the ass that you passed around. Make the point no student faculty member ever filed a complaint. A woman known for her hostility filed one against the wishes of the person actually involved. 12:06:10 am Lucy hawkings a problem however 12:06:48 am The letter states how disppointed and shocked that behavior over many years. . blah blah. I would also add the strange admonition that you didn't adequaltey supervise your director. Thought there were no complaints made by faculty, grievance committee will need to review. 12:08:27 am Lawrence Thanks. It now starts with the photo. More on that later. Lucy is not a problem. What you don't know is that i can document that the conversation at the restaurant took place over a year before the discussion amongst us thinking about suggesting she come to asu happened. L 12:08:32 am And that giving her a hug and a peckon the cheek in greeting or leaving made for a hostile work environment 12:09:01 am • EFTA01614020  Lawrence Yes. All in the appeal doc. And university says Case demonstrates repeated pervasive behavior but what you don't know is I can document that dean and gc net with me on December, learned the details of case thing and declared that it was ridiculous overreaction and unwarranted. Now they are using it to the contrary to their advantage. L 12:11:02 am List one silliness after another. With the language that states. , I ask the public to make their own judgment. I won't characterize it, at the moment, in order to present an unbiased fact airing. YOU DECIDE ! Should be the mantra 12:11.05 am Case is a problem . ! your apology to video wacko is a problem. But I think lead with the photo and list silly after silly, Lucy, case, dont argue facts. You will lose 12:12:35 am Recall their position is that you are currently unable to teach given your bad reputation . Its strong 12:13:09 am Lawrence • Thanks. No evidence by the way of bad reputation in university or without btw. 12:13:50 am All useful. More later. L 12:14:05 am Case and perimeter . Get real 12:14:23 am EFTA01614021  Lawrence More on that later. Case gave me several counter offers after I came to asu. L 12:14:58 am Facts 12:33:01 am Arguments not relevant 12:33:35 am The finder of fact heard both sides and did not believe you. That a problem 12:34:21 am Lawrence Yes. About to do barbecue for guests. L 12:35:24 am Ok foot note 2 says his did not believe the photo was photobombed . 12:36:25 am OIS 12:36:29 am Lawrence Yes but the point is that the OEI, which wrote the investigative report did think so. The investigators concluded that photo was a violation of some policy. That the provost didn't buy it doesn't change the fact that OEI is stupid and biased. L 12:38:00 am EFTA01614022  2018/08/07 Lawrence Some things Nancy sent me a few weeks ago: http://www.saveservices.org/2018/07/pr-legal-experts-and-professors-join-forces- endorse-letter-opposing-biased-investigation-practices/ http://www.saveservices.org/sexual-assault/investigations/ "There are four recognized legal theories under Title IX; erroneous outcome, selective enforcement, deliberate indifference and retaliation. If you are considering a lawsuit, find out which theory best fits your circumstances. #WarshawBurstein #TitlelX #collegedisciplinelaw L 05:07:07 pm 2018/08/24 Lawrence Called. No answer. Have made final revisions including formatting and response to some Justin hysteria. Was hoping to get your comments before heading out. 07:46:07 pin You are one of the most amazing people I have ever known. L 10:25:25 pin 2018/08/25 Must be drinking again 01:45:38 am Lawrence You got it. :)) 01:46:21 am How about flying with me to Germany in October. L 01:46:44 am EFTA01614023  Perry mason has another case that month 01:47:21 am ✓ Sent Lawrence L 01:47:47 am ✓ Read EFTA01614024