📄 Extracted Text (457 words)
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE 15th JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA
CIVIL DIVISION
CASE NO. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG
Judge David F. Crow
JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
Plaintiff,
v.
SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF/COUNTER-DEFENDANT JEFFREY EPSTEIN'S PROPOSAL
FOR SETTLEMENT TO DEFENDANT/COUNTER-PLAINTIFF
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS. INDIVIDUALLY
Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, by and through undersigned counsel,
hereby serves this Proposal for Settlement upon Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J.
EDWARDS, individually, pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.442:
I. This Proposal is being made pursuant to §768.79, Fla. Stat. and Fla. R. Civ. P.
1.442.
2. This Proposal is being made on behalf of Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY
EPSTEIN.
3. This Proposal is being made to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J.
EDWARDS, individually.
4. This Proposal is directed to, and is intended to resolve, all claims pled or which
could have been pled in the instant action (Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB-AG) by
Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, against Plaintiff/Counter-
Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, including any and all claims for compensatory damages,
interest, and costs. This Proposal is not directed to, and is not intended to resolve, any claims
FOWLER mint BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA.
EFTA01114612
CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG
pled or which could have been pled by Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN,
against DefendanUCounter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS.
5. Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY EDWARDS, has not asserted a claim
for punitive damages against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, nor are
attorney's fees part of the legal claim brought by Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff, BRADLEY
EDWARDS, against Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, JEFFREY EPSTEIN, although this Proposal
is intended to resolve all such claims if available.
6. The total amount of this Proposal is Three Hundred Thousand Dollars and 00/100
($300,000.00).
7. The conditions of this Proposal are: (1) that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff,
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, shall execute and deliver to undersigned counsel the
General Release attached hereto as Exhibit "A;" and (2) that Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff
BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, shall, by and through his attorney, execute and deliver
to undersigned counsel the Stipulation for Dismissal with Prejudice attached hereto as Exhibit
8. This Proposal shall expire in thirty (30) days from its service unless withdrawn in
writing prior to that date. Any acceptance of this Proposal must be in writing and must be an
acceptance of the entire Proposal as outlined above.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the foregoing was faxed and mailed
this day of August, 2011 to Jack Scarola, Esq., Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart &
Shipley, P.A.,
-2-
FOWLER wiint BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA,
EFTA01114613
CASE NO. 50 2009 CA 040800 XXXXMB AG
Joseph L Ackerman, Jr.
Fla. Bar No. 235954
FOWLER WHITE BURNETT, P.A.
Espirito Santo Plaza. Fourteenth Floor
W:\80743WROSEfSS•AUS.dacx
-3-
FOWLER wiint BURNETT P.A. • ESPIRITO SANTO PLAZA,
EFTA01114614
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
ce60ce812189ad2293c99a951ece8fda9f3d0a0f96adced5653dbd98c717f07a
Bates Number
EFTA01114612
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
3
Comments 0