EFTA01196087
EFTA01196088 DataSet-9
EFTA01196090

EFTA01196088.pdf

DataSet-9 2 pages 849 words document
P17 V15 V9 D1 P23
Open PDF directly ↗ View extracted text
👁 1 💬 0
📄 Extracted Text (849 words)
Rev. Rul. 81-282. 1981-2 CB 78 IRC Seels). 170 Checkpoint Contents Federal Library Federal Source Materials IRS Rulings & Releases Revenue Rulings & Procedures, Notices, Announcements, Executive & Delegation Orders, News Releases & Other IRS Documents Revenue Rulings (1954 to Present) 1981 Rev. Rul. 81-311 through Rev. Rul. 81-262 Rev. Rul. 81-282, 1981-2 CB 78 -- IRC Sec(s). 170 Revenue Rulings Rev. Rul. 81-282, 1981-2 CB 78, IRC Sec(s). 170 Headnote: Rev. Rul. 81 -282 , 1981-2 CB 78 -- IRC Sec. 170 Reference(s): Code Sec. 170; Reg § 1.170a-7 Charitable contribution; voting stock. A contribution of voting stock to a charitable organization with the donor retaining the right to vote that stock constitutes a contribution of a partial interest under Elsection 170(9(3) of the Code for which a charitable contribution deduction is not allowable. Full Text: ISSUE Are contributions of stock deductible under ['section 170 of the Internal Revenue Code in the situation described below? FACTS A, an individual, is a shareholder of X corporation. A contributes 100x shares of A's voting stock in X to Y, an organization described in Eisection 170(c) of the Code. A retains the right to vote the contributed stock. LAW AND ANALYSIS EiSection 170(a)(1) of the Code allows a deduction, subject to certain limitations, <Page 79> for any charitable contribution (as defined in section 170(c) paid during the tax year. Rev_Rul_81_282_1981_2_CB_78 IRC_See_s 170.1(0107/7/2014 3:54:33 PM) EFTA01196088 Rev. Rul. 81-282. 1981-2 CB 78 -- 1RC See(s). 170 [' Section 170(f)(3) of the Code denies a charitable contribution deduction for certain contributions of partial interests in property. Section 170(f) (3)(A) provides that no charitable deduction is allowed for a contribution of less than the taxpayer's entire interest in property unless the contribution would have been allowed had it been transferred in trust. A contribution by a taxpayer of the right to use property is treated as a contribution of less than the taxpayer's entire interest in property. Section 170(f)(3)(B)(10 of the Code and Ei section 1.170A-7(b) of the Income Tax Regulations provide that a deduction is allowed under ['section 170 of the Code for a contribution not in trust of a partial interest that is less than the donors entire interest in property if the partial interest is an undivided portion of the donors entire interest. An undivided portion of a donors entire interest in property must consist of a fraction or percentage of each and every substantial interest or right owned by the donor in such property. A charitable contribution in perpetuity of an interest in property not in trust if the donor transfers some specific rights and retains other substantial rights will not be considered a contribution of an undivided portion of the donors entire interest in property to which section 170(f)(3)(A) of the Code does not apply. Thus, for example, a deduction is not allowable for the value of an immediate and perpetual gift not in trust of an interest in original historic motion picture films to a charitable organization if the donor retains the exclusive right to make reproductions of such films and to exploit such reproductions commercially. ['Section 1.170A-7(B)(1). [' Rev. Rul. 76-143, 1976-1 C.B. 63, considered two situations involving an irrevocable assignment to a college of the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy. In Situation 1 the college was given possession of a paid-up policy, but the taxpayer retained the right to name or change the beneficiary and to assign the policy subject to the college's right to the cash surrender value. Even though the donor could not defeat the charity's interest in the life insurance policy, the revenue ruling stated that the rights retained by the donor were substantial rights and held that, in this situation, the taxpayer's gift was a gift of a partial interest in property that was not deductible under ['section 170 of the Code. See also [' Rev. Rul. 76-331, 1976-2 C.B. 52. The right to vote stock is inherent in the ownership of common stock and, as such, is a property right. This right gives the holder a voice in the management of the corporation and is crucial in protecting the stockholder's financial interest. Therefore, the right to vote the stock of Xis a substantial right in that stock. See Brown v. McLanahan, 148 F.2d 703 (4th Cir. 1945): and DuVall v. Moore, 276 F. Supp. 674 (E. Iowa 1967). While A's retention of the right to vote the stock will not defeat Vs right to dividends or the right to dispose of the stock, and, while the right retained by the donor will not defeat the donee's interest in the transferred property, nevertheless, A has not transferred all substantial rights in the stock to Y. Therefore, A has transferred a partial interest in property to Ywithin the meaning of Ei section 170(0(3) of the Code. See [' Rev. Rul. 76-143. HOLDING A is not entitled to a charitable contribution deduction under ['section 170 of the Code for the transfer of the X stock to Y. 2014 Thomson Reulersfrax & Accounting. All Rights Reserved. Rev_Rul_81_282_1981_2_CB_78 IRC_See_s 170.18n07/7/2014 3:54:33 PM) EFTA01196089
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d0f86994cf4d41b31e3e03a90589774a169be6281fda2459db8e17d16943ab78
Bates Number
EFTA01196088
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
2

Comments 0

Loading comments…
Link copied!