📄 Extracted Text (291 words)
From: (MM) (FBI)" <MIME
To: Y) (FBI)" (MM) (FBI)"
Cc: ' NY) (FBI)" ■
Subject: Re: Epstein documents
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:41:19 +0000
Importance: Normal
1MMI, we have been in consultation with FBIHQ Office of General Counsel (OGC) on this matter. The point
of contact is It is my understanding that Attorney will be reaching out to you to discuss
this matter further. Thank you.
On Jun 26, 2019 4:32 PM, "4 (NY) (FBI)" wrote:
Following up on yesterday's email. Let us know if MM has an objection to SDNY digitizing aspects of the
MM file. I'd like to start the process by the end of this week.
Thanks
On Jun 25, 2019 2:05 PM, (NY) (FBI)" wrote:
All,
Over the past 90 days I know there has been some discussion regarding the need to turn over appropriate
documents, from the MM WPBRA investigation of Epstein, to the SDNY.
We are now on a very short timeline as we plan to indict Epstein next Tuesday. While the arrest date will
depend on his travel back into the US (he's currently OCONUS), we need to get the does to SDNY in case
he presses for an expedited trial.
SDNY has funding and a contractor which they regularly use to scan docs in for review, discovery, etc. This
is something NY has done with SDNY other times in the past. I met with the SDNY Chief of Criminal last
Thursday who expressed her concerns and inquired about the need to escalate.
Trying to avoid the escalation from SDNY. can you confirm the position from MM?
I greatly appreciate the help MM has provided so far and know we're all only interested in justice for the
victims in this case.
Thanks
EFTA00149473
ℹ️ Document Details
SHA-256
d91febe2082dcadf94539473baf1aafc77982d3d94118815d42b277330d6e949
Bates Number
EFTA00149473
Dataset
DataSet-9
Document Type
document
Pages
1
Comments 0