…criminal proceedings, Maxwell instead criticizes the court-ordered unsealing process generally, claiming that the unsealing process has been weaponized against her and that the media has not “served the function of ‘monitoring the federal courts.’” Maxwell Br. at 2. Maxwell…
…Record (19 Civ. 3377 (LAP)) 3 This highlights yet another issue regarding Dershowitz’s request – namely, that he provides no suggestion as to how the host of interested parties in Maxwell may monitor and, as necessary, object to Dershowitz’s…
…2d Cir. 2017) (explaining that, in considering whether the report of a monitor charged with assessing compliance with a deferred prosecution agreement is a judicial 14 Case Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP 16-3945, Document Document 315-2, 08…
…The courts are presumptively public, and the public has a right to monitor the judicial process—particularly as concerns Ms. Giuffre’s accusations, which her own attorneys have argued (in opposing restrictions on public access to court filings detailing them…
…such 3 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 995 Filed 10/02/19 Page 5 of 11 evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm. Such materials are therefore of value to those monitoring the federal courts. Thus…
…weight afforded to the presumption of access is “governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Lugosch v…
…presumption of access, which is a function of "the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power" and "the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts." See id.; Stern v…
…marks omitted). This presumption is grounded in principles of transparency and government accountability. As recognized by the Second Circuit: [P]rofessional and public monitoring is an essential feature of democratic control. Monitoring both provides judges with critical views of their…
…of access. “[T]he presumption of access must be governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts. Generally…
…access that should be accorded it. The weight accorded a judicial document depends upon its role “in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Id. at 49…
…s plight. However, when the Article III power of the Court is invoked, “access to testimony and documents” makes monitoring necessary to instill in the public “confidence in the conscientiousness, reasonableness, or honesty of judicial proceedings.” United States v. Amodeo…
…which applies to regulation 5(3), provides that the Safety Management System issue shall address monitoring performance and ‘the mechanisms for investigation and taking corrective action in the case of non compliance’ (paragraph 4(f)). Paragraph 4(f) also provides…
…omitted). Thus, we have held jurisdiction lacking to review “postjudgment discovery orders,” but available to review “postjudgment orders denying motions for recusal” or for “disqualif[ication of] a court-appointed monitor” because in the first scenario the “relevant final decision . …
…2d Cir. 2017) (explaining that, in considering whether the report of a monitor charged with assessing compliance with a deferred prosecution agreement is a judicial 14 Case Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS 18-2868, DocumentDocument 217-1, 07/03…
…2d Cir. 2017) (explaining that, in considering whether the report of a monitor charged with assessing compliance with a deferred prosecution agreement is a judicial 14 Case Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP 18-2868, DocumentDocument 273-2, 08/09…
…2019). Because “erroneous judicial decision-making with respect to such evidentiary and discovery matters can cause substantial harm,” the documents are “of value ‘to those monitoring the federal courts’” and “subject to at least some presumption of public access.” Id…
…. to those monitoring the federal courts,” id., as there is nothing judicial to see there. To whatever extent a lapsed motion notwithstanding Brown and Amodeo I might achieve the status of a negligibly judicial document merely by acquiring a file…
…of that presumption; that determination is “governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts.” Id. The information generally…
…that the weight of the presumption is a function of: "(1) the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and (2) the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the federal courts…
…must be governed by the role of the material at issue in the exercise of Article III judicial power and the resultant value of such information to those monitoring the 11 “This is a case concerning sex abuse of minors…
Comments