…201 7, the Court addressed and resolved the ore tenus motion requesting the redaction of the non-party's witness name, that did not address the substance of the Non-Party's Motion for Protective Order which seeks relief from…
…exhibits. Upon the issuance of its mandate, the Second Circuit specifically made these materials available on its own docket, subject to what it held were appropriate redactions for personally identifying information, names of alleged minor victims of sexual abuse, and…
…1079 at 3-4). The Court already reviewed and approved Plaintiff’s proposed redactions for these documents, and Plaintiff has verified that redactions are in place for each of the categories of information identified in the Court’s July 30…
…but the redactions of the names of Non-Parties whose time to object has expired should be removed…
…Non-Party Notice to all remaining Non-Parties was to expedite the review process by minimizing the number of redactions applied at each round and allowing the Court to have more clarity on which Non-Parties were actually objecting to…
…crucially that the Second Circuit, by its redactions, implicitly held that the deposition contained “responses concerning intimate matters where the questions were likely only permitted – and the responses only compelled – because of a strong expectation of continued confidentiality.” See Resp…
…her current country, the Parties and the Miami Herald consent to redacting Doe 107's name and any personally identifying information in the docket entries that the Court previously ordered unsealed. Giuffre's and the Miami Herald's consent to…
…as Ms. Maxwell proposes, then a single document such as initial disclosures or a witness list will continue to resurface in every round, only to have redactions removed from a few names each time, thereby multiplying the review. Instead, if…
…orders. Second, Defendant proposes that paragraph 3(e) be deleted in its entirety. Plaintiff disagrees. This paragraph allows the Court to determine what redactions are appropriate, in consultation with the parties, before filing Non-Parties’ objections on the docket. To…
…other. As discussed in more detail below, the former group can maintain privacy by narrowly redacting information that would identify those who have not previously been publicly identified 1 As with prior filings, counsel for Intervenors have seen only Ms…
…Intervenors do not have access to the unredacted letter and can only understand the contents based on the context surrounding the redactions. Anchorage | Atlanta | Austin | Boston | Charlotte | Chicago | Dallas | Denver | Fort Lauderdale…
…personal identifying information as to any person mentioned in the documents,” 2) “the names of nonparties other than Does 1 and 2,” and 3) “other portions related to such nonparties’ specific conduct.” The rationale for redacting categories 2 and 3…
…unsealing in full, that finding related only to the mentions of the specific Doe, not to any and all redactions in the document. As counsel is aware, this case has attracted a great deal of public attention, and there are…
…non- parties is no longer appropriate. Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Parties be permitted to review and publish the sealed materials subject to redactions to protect the names and personally identifiable information of victims only, which would greatly expedite the…
…may be made ad hoc. 5. Proposed Redactions: The Court will not require the Original Parties to include with any brief in support of unsealing a sealed set of proposed redactions for in camera review. 6. Appeals: Counsel for Ms…
…Attached as Exhibit E (Filed Under Seal) is true and correct copy of DE 340-1 with Ms. Maxwell’s Proposed Redactions as described in her Reply Memorandum. 3. Attached as Exhibit F is an Amended summary chart of Ms…
…her current country, the Parties and the Miami Herald consent to redacting Doe 107's name and any personally identifying information in the docket entries that the Court previously ordered unsealed. Giuffre's and the Miami H…
…to confirm that her counsel may release “later today” the previously unsealed deposition testimony of Ms. Maxwell and Doe 1 (“Unsealed Materials”), while redacting Doe 1’s name from the materials that will be filed. We oppose Plaintiff’s request…
…materials in this way. Moreover, these improper redactions are in derogation of the “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents,” that has long been recognized by the Supreme Court. See Nixon v…
…denial of summary judgment was filed in redacted form on April 27, 2017, implicitly denying Cernovich Media’s Opposition to Notice of Plaintiff’s Proposed Redactions to this Court’s Order Denying Summary Judgment (ECF No. 833). Dated: May 31…
Comments