…2021 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Limited Motion to Reconsider Proposed Redactions of Ms. Maxwell’s July 2016 Deposition Transcript Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell…
…of the Court’s unsealing order: it unseals nearly 2000 pages of material. The task of identifying and making specific redactions in such a substantial volume is perilous; the consequences of even a seemingly minor error may be grave and…
…of the Court’s unsealing order: it unseals nearly 2000 pages of material. The task of identifying and making specific redactions in such a substantial volume is perilous; the consequences of even a seemingly minor error may be grave and…
…2021 Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: Limited Motion to Reconsider Proposed Redactions of Ms. Maxwell’s July 2016 Deposition Transcript Giuffre v. Ghislaine Maxwell…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…nonparty names will await notice to those parties and an opportunity for them to be heard.” Id. 5:20-6:1. Plaintiff’s counsel sent defense counsel the documents with proposed redactions on a rolling basis, beginning on July 25…
… That's a black redaction of the 19 name of the minor and there is -- I will 20 represent for the record that's what it is. 21 You can contest that but I'm not asking about 22 the…
…there is an error and that Plaintiff does not dispute that assertion. Plaintiff merely contends that any redactions be narrowly tailored to address the countervailing interests Doe 54 raised. II. Does 55 and 56 Have Not Rebutted the Presumption in…
…1 On December 5, 2022, Doe 171 also filed a Notice of Intention to Request Redaction, requesting that the November 18 Order transcript not be made electronically available until the Court ruled on Doe 171’s December 5 Motion. (Dkt…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…but the redactions of the names of Non-Parties whose time to object has expired should be removed. Unseal and redact only names and identifying information of Non-Parties who have objected to unsealing or whose time to …
…s Reply/Combined Opposition; therefore, the redaction of non-party’s name on page 1 and signature block on page 23 do not affect the original un-redacted reply or supporting declaration submitted to the Court. Accordingly, re-filed DE…
…court filing.” Ms. Maxwell remains concerned that Non-Parties will be reluctant to participate in this process if their objection will itself become publicized and also believes that despite best redaction efforts and pseudonym efforts, any objections may reveal the…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…The task can only be properly accomplished with a thorough line-by-line review of each of the redactions contained within the briefing papers and briefing-related papers. It likewise is a substantial undertaking to identify even in summary fashion…
…weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to an item, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction of the item, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded itto the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…LAP Document 1226 Filed 08/04/21 Page 2 of 4 August 4, 2021 Page 2 of 4 The second issue arises from the parties’ failure to properly make redactions …
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
…a) the weight of presumption of public access that should be afforded to the document, (b) the identification and weight of any countervailing interests supporting continued sealing/redaction, and (c) whether the countervailing interests rebut the presumption of public access…
Comments