…reason.” Id. at 319. Dershowitz asserts that the Maxwell Protective Order is a “blanket order” that covers “all” documents “without consideration as to whether a specific document actually contains justifiably confidential material.” Maxwell, DE 1058-1 at 2. Not so…
…without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.” Ms. Ransome and her five attorneys admittedly did not expressly make any such claim nor did they describe the nature of the withheld documents. The…
…submissions on the docket. Any objections must be public to allow Intervenors and the public to assess the form and merit of the objections being made and meaningfully respond to them. Sincerely yours, HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP …
…Merit. Ms. Maxwell asserts objections based on alleged “countervailing interests” that are not recognized in the extensive body of case law addressing whether a judicial document may be sealed by the Court. A. Reliance on a Protective Order By a…
…with an express finding that the [defamation] was intended to injure plaintiff and did in fact cause injury, authorizes the jury to consider and assess punitive damages without any finding of a specific amount of compensatory damages." Lawnwood Med. Ctr.…
…and Work Product Privileges by Putting Plaintiff’s Representation At Issue in the Dershowitz Case “The [attorney-client] privilege may implicitly be waived when [a party] asserts a claim that in fairness requires examination of protected communications.” United States v…
… Mr. Cassell asserts that the Palm Beach Police Report “showed the sexual abuse was occurring on a daily basis” at the Epstein mansion, and thus “that [it] would have made it obvious to a visiting guest that young girls were…
…without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.” Ms. Ransome and her five attorneys admittedly did not expressly make any such claim nor did they describe the nature of the withheld documents. The…
…shown defamation may recover at least nominal damages,’” and confirming an award of punitive damages) (internal citation omitted). “In assessing the amount of damages to award for defamation, a jury is not limited to compensating the plaintiff for ‘economic’ losses…
…s agent Ross Gow on communications with her attorney destroyed the privilege, despite binding New York law to the contrary. Plaintiff asserts that Ms. Maxwell and Mr. Epstein and their counsel were not in a common interest agreement without once…
…available to district courts in protecting the integrity of the judicial process, and emphasize the courts’ responsibility to exercise these powerful tools. We also caution the public to critically assess allegations contained in judicial pleadings. 9 Nixon v. Warner Commcʹns…
…evidence comes out, it will be clear why Ms. Maxwell and others who enabled Jeffrey Epstein are fighting so hard to keep it concealed. As our client Virginia Giuffre bravely asserts, they did not act alone.” Id. Ms. McCawley also…
…the privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. order must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party's officer from (B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to a significant expense…
…was 14 applicable . 15 So what we have here is qualified privileges being 16 asserted as to defamatory statements. The two qualified 17 privileges she asserts are the self-defense privilege and the 18 prelitigation privilege. So in other words…
…directed in the order, und lhe privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess ille claim. order mllst protect a person who is neither II pHny nor a party'~ "metr tiol!) (U) Information Produced. If information produced in…
…2020 [dkt. no. 1111-1].) The USVI asserts in its CICO action that Epstein ran a criminal sex trafficking operation in the Virgin Islands, “wherein he used his vast wealth and property holdings and a deliberately opaque web of corporations…
…Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that the court may impose a range of sanctions, including dismissal or judgment by default, preclusion of evidence, imposition of an adverse inference, or assessment of attorneys' fees and costs. Fed. R. Civ. P…
…Maxwell argues that "Miami Herald has no hope of carrying its burden of unsealing every sealed document. Because it has not seen each document it has no ability to assess whether a particular document is a judicial document…". Opp…
…Cir. 2006) (noting that if a court finds documents to be judicial, it must then assess the weight of the presumed access and determine if countervailing factors override the presumption). Once again, Dershowitz’s own cited cases are his undoing…
…Interrog. No. 6) and whether Plaintiff has been defamed by anyone other than 1 Plaintiff additionally asserts that no interrogatories are permitted pursuant to Local Rule 33.3 prior to the last 30 days of discovery. See Menninger Decl. Ex…