…Plaintiff asserts her belief that the Court will consider in this current round of unsealing not only whether to release Doe 1 and 2’s names and identifying information but also the same information for any Non-Party “whose deadlines…
…s arguments, and allow Plaintiff to file these materials as it has already ordered. Maxwell asserts that Plaintiff’s proposed redactions do not remove “descriptions of nonparty conduct to discern the identity of a given non-party.” ECF No. 1129…
…Maxwell asserts that she will need time to review each Non-Party Objection to decide whether or not to submit a Party Objection under section 2(e) of the Protocol, but Maxwell is not required to file a separate Party…
…merit. Disagreeing with opposing counsel’s arguments is not a basis for withholding them from public view. This Court has already ruled that the same countervailing interests Ms. Maxwell asserts in her present Objections were conclusory and speculative. See App…
…17 Ms. Giuffre, likewise, asserts certain privacy 18 interests that she argues outweigh the presumption of public 19 access in certain documents. The Court finds, as it did for 20 the last round of motions it considered for unsealing, that…
…it would indicate that in the column. 23 So, we have started that project in assessing this 24 thinking that would be beneficial to the Court. We need a 25 little bit more time to complete it but I think…
…criminal case. She has incorporated these previously 11 made arguments by reference in her briefing of the motions at 12 issue today. She also asserts that media coverage of unsealed 13 documents has not served the purpose of, quote, "monitoring…
…it is the Court’s role to assess the reliability of the materials and claims at issue. 3 Intervenors discount the possibility that revealing third-party information may have the secondary effect of revealing information about child abuse victims – even…
…DE 1156-1; DE 258-3. Plaintiff incorrectly asserts that the parties agreed that they “would need to redact fewer names in documents that are ordered unsealed” based on who had failed to object to unsealing. To the contrary, Ms…
…judicial documents should remain under seal, Maxwell instead submits a chart with the same generic “Countervailing Interests” this Court has already rejected, and asserts three vague arguments in favor of continued sealing. First, Maxwell wrongly asserts that her July 2016…
…evidence comes out, it will be clear why Ms. Maxwell and others who enabled Jeffrey Epstein are fighting so hard to keep it concealed. As our client Virginia Giuffre bravely asserts, they did not act alone.” Id. Ms. McCawley also…
…the court as part of the decree-approval process, they were “‘relevant and material” to the process, and the district court “relied upon the documents in assessing the reasonableness of the order, i.e., in determining the litigants’ substantive rights…
…Earlier today, the DOJ released an additional three million pages of Epstein-related records. 4 Maxwell’s counsel asserts that many John Does “relied” on the Protective Order (Dkt. 62) in this case and therefore require an opportunity to object…
…The only countervailing interests that Doe 144 asserts are related to potential reputational harm—the weight of that countervailing interest is necessarily affected by the fact that Plaintiff’s allegations about Doe 144’s conduct are already public and have…
Comments