…Henkel, 201 U.S. 43 (1906) ............................................................................................ 2, 4 In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 945 F.2d 1221 (2d Cir. 1991) ................................... 14 In re Grand Jury Subpoena, JK-15-029, 828 F.3d 1083 (9th Cir. 2016) ............................. 4, 5…
…F.3d 105 (2d Cir. 2012).....................................................................................8, 10, 11, 13 In re Behar, 779 F. Supp. 273 (S.D.N.Y. 1991)...........................................................................................13 Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Wigand, No. 101678/96, 1996 WL…
…v. Moore, 726 N.E.2d 456, 460 (N.Y. 1999) ...................................................... 48 iv Immuno AG v. Moor-Jankowski, 567 N.E.2d 1270, 1282 (N.Y. 1991) ...................... 11, 19 Indep. Living Aids, Inc. v. Maxi-Aids, Inc., 981 F. Supp…
…Chase, 942 F.2d 130, 135 (2d Cir. 1991)). And, whatever Cooper & Kirk’s intentions in requesting and obtaining the Maxwell materials from Boies 3 This Court disqualified Boies Schiller Flexner from continued representation of Ms. Giuffre in its October…
…a terrible invasion of their physical privacy. They have a right to expect that this violation will not be compounded by a further invasion of their privacy.” 1991 McKinney's Sessions Laws of N.Y., at 2211–2212 (quoted in…
…g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir. 1991) (“attorney-client privilege cannot at once be used as a shield and a sword”); McGrath v. Nassau County Health Care Corp., 204 F.R.D. 240, 245…
…Supp. 61, 65 (D.V.I. 1991) (allowing use of videotape deposition at trial because it allowed jury to observe the witness’s demeanor and evaluate credibility). Where, as here, a non-party deponent will invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege…
…N.Y. 1991) (granting motion to stay where discovery request are extensive and plaintiffs already possessed extensive discovery material as a result of prior proceedings). 4 Docket available at http://www.clerk-17th- flcourts.org/Web2/CaseSearch/Details/?caseid=NzkzMzM0MQ%3d…
…in Immuno AG v. Moor - Jankowski, 567 N.E.2d 1270 (N . Y. 1991) ; the difference is that the Davis court collapsed the Immuno AG's third and fourth factors into one. See Davis, 22 N. E.3d at 1005…
…client privilege and the work product doctrine. Old Holdings, Ltd v. Taplin, Howard, Shaw & Miller, P.A., 584 So.2d 1128, 1128~29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Fla. R. Civ. P. l.280(b)(4); see Markel Am. Ins. Co. v…
…g., United States v. Bilzerian, 926 F.2d 1285, 1292 (2d Cir. 1991) (“attorney-client privilege cannot at once be used as a shield and a sword”); McGrath v. Nassau County Health Care Corp., 204 F.R.D. 240, 245…
…1999) ...................................................... 48 iv Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 538 Filed 01/06/17 Page 6 of 10 Immuno AG v. Moor-Jankowski, 567 N.E.2d 1270, 1282 (N.Y. 1991) ...................... 11, 19 Indep. Living Aids, Inc…
…37 F.3d 1541, 1562-63 (4th Cir. 1991) (measured replies non-actionable despite using labels such as “heinous lies,” “downright filth,” and “filthy dirt…like from the bottom of a cesspool”). II. MS. MAXWELL’S STATEMENTS ARE PROTECTED…
Comments