…10 United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995) .....................................................................................................2 United States v. Graham, 257 F.3d 143 (2d Cir. 2001) ...................................................................................................9 …
…71 F.3d 1044, 1049-50 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Amodeo II”)); (b) any minimum presumption of public access is subject to many countervailing interests supporting continued sealing; and (c) the countervailing interests rebut any minimal presumption of public access. II…
…United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Amodeo II”)). The Brown court expressly acknowledged the right of an accused as a “countervailing interest” worthy of overcoming any presumption of access. Id.at 47 n. 13. (…
…v. TheStreet.Com, 273 F.3d 222 (2d Cir. 2001) .................................................................................................... 10 United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995) ........................................................................................................ 2 United States v. Amo…
…54; United States v. Amodeo (“Amodeo I”), 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995) (“[t]he privacy interests of innocent third parties . . . should weigh heavily in a court’s balancing equation”) (internal quotations omitted). B. “Ancillary” court submissions. A…
…cf. United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044, 1050 (2d Cir. 1995) (noting that law enforcement “may be heavily reliant upon the voluntary cooperation of persons who may want or need confidentiality . . . [i]f that confidentiality cannot be assured…
…and 56 are such that there is a greater need to seal material related to them under United States v. Amodeo, 71 F.3d 1044 (2d Cir. 1995), and its progeny. Both points are incorrect. First, in their principal objection…
…Amodeo (“Amodeo II”), 71 F.3d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir. 1995). Ms. Maxwell cannot take on the burden of asserting the privacy interests of each Non-Party who failed to object. The Second Circuit was able to determine for itself…
…71 F.3d 1044, 1048 (2d Cir. 1995)). Thus, “professional and public monitoring” of the courts “is an essential feature of democratic control” of the third branch of government, which necessarily requires public “access to testimony and documents that are…
…LAP Document 980 Filed 09/03/19 Page 4 of 10 September 3, 2019 Page 4 of 7 1995) (“Documents that play no role in the performance of Article III functions, such as those passed between the parties in discovery…
…Clark County, Nevada, Case No. A493744-C (Apr. 16, 2013) .......................... 4 United States v. Amodeo II, 71 F.3d 1044 (2d Cir. 1995).......................................................................................... 5, 7, 9, 10 United States v. Burr, 25 F. Cas. 1 (No. 14,692) (CC Va…
…See United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995). 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1155 Filed 11/19/20 Page 6 of 13 Additionally, a blanket protective order, such as the one at…
…1050-51 (2d Cir. 1995) (internal citations omitted). Doe 144 is not the arbiter of what is “scandalous” or “unfounded allegations.” Taken to its logical conclusion, Doe 144’s argument implies that the Court should presumptively seal material about non…
…access ' is not as pressing. '" United States v . Amodeo , 7 1 F . 3d 1044 , 1049 (2d Cir . 1995) (quoting In re Reporters Comm . for Freedom of the Press , 773 F . 2d 1325, 1342 n . 3 (D . C . Cir . 1985) (Wright…
Comments