…71 F.3d 1044, 1049-50 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Amodeo II”)); (b) any minimum presumption of public access is subject to many countervailing interests supporting continued sealing; and (c) the countervailing interests rebut any minimal presumption of public access. II…
…quoting United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141, 145 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Amodeo I”)). Amodeo I, the inception of the Second Circuit’s principle that a file stamp is not a judicial-document talisman, is instructive. There an appointed…
…Coll., 163 F.R.D. 170, 171-72 (D.Mass.1995) (citation omitted). Accordingly, “[t]he mere fact that many individuals may have discoverable information does not necessarily entitle a party to depose each such individual.” Dixon v. Certainteed Corp…
…437, 440 (Sup. Ct. 1995) (source “had no understanding or expectation of confidentiality with either Mr. Hurley or the police detectives regarding the viewing of the interrogation. Consequently, there is no absolute privilege which protects the movant's materials, see…
…F.Supp.2d 417 (S.D.N.Y. 2007)......................................................................................... 16 U.S. v. Amodeo ("Amodeo I"), 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995)................................................................................................. passim U.S. v. Amodeo ("Amodeo II"), 71 F.3d 1044 (2d C…
…838 (N.Y. Sup.Ct. 1995) (holding that in a personal injury action, plaintiff's waiver of the physician-patient privilege “is not a wholesale waiver of all information about the plaintiff’s entire physical and mental conditions but a…
…some of the largest corporations and U.S. politicians as clients. Dershowitz is perhaps most prominently known for being the appellate defense lawyer in the murder trial of O.J. Simpson in 1995, and, an outspoken supporter of gun control…
…v. Brennan, 579 F.2d 188 (2d Cir. 1978).............................................................................................. 11 United States v. Amodeo (Amodeo I), 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995)................................................................................................ 14 United States v. Amod…
…documents bears the burden of demonstrating “that the interests favoring non- access outweigh those favoring access.” United States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141, 148 (2d Cir. 1995); see also In re Parmalat Sec. Litig., 258 F.R.D. 236…
…by 161 F.R.D. 258 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (otherwise privileged communications put in issue where party “asserts a factual claim the truth of which can only be assessed by examination of a privileged communication”); United States v…
…N.Y. 2004); Labatt Ltd. v. Molson Breweries, Nos. 93 CV 75004, 94 CV 71540(RPP), 1995 WL 23603 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 20, 1995); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 575-76 (1st Cir. 2001…
…by 161 F.R.D. 258 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (otherwise privileged communications put in issue where party “asserts a factual claim the truth of which can only be assessed by examination of a privileged communication”); United States v…
…v. Rogers, 903 F.Supp. 663, 668 (S.D.N.Y.1995) (Sweet, J.) (“it is too early at this point in the proceeding [i.e., during discovery] to determine [whether counsel’s testimony would be necessary]”; McDonald v. Hammons…
…N.Y. 2004); Labatt Ltd. v. Molson Breweries, Nos. 93 CV 75004, 94 CV 71540(RPP), 1995 WL 23603 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 20, 1995); In re Grand Jury Subpoena, 274 F.3d 563, 575-76 (1st Cir. 2001…
…Cir. Nov. 10, 2015) ............................... 15 Stroh v. Gen. Motors Corp., 623 N.Y.S.2d 873, 874-75 (1st Dep’t 1995) ......................... 8 United States v. Kovel, 296 F.2d 918 (2d Cir. 1961). ....................................................... 10 United States v. Schwimmer, 892…
…Supp. 3d at 444. 1671 F.3d 1044, 1049 (2d Cir. 1995) (“Amodeo II”) (“One judge [in the District of Columbia Circuit] has pointed out, for example, that where a district court denied the summary judgment motion, essentially postponing a…
…5901, 2016 WL 3951181 (S.D.N.Y. July 20, 2016) ....................................... 9 United States v. Amodeo (Amodeo II), 71 F.3d 1044 (2d Cir. 1995)............................................................................................ 3, 5 United States v. Bagley, 473 U.S. 667 (1985) ........................…
…v. Brennan, 579 F.2d 188 (2d Cir. 1978).............................................................................................. 11 United States v. Amodeo (Amodeo I), 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995)................................................................................................ 14 United States v. Amod…
…States v. Amodeo, 44 F.3d 141 (2d Cir. 1995) ("Amodeo I") (finding it proper for district court to edit and redact judicial document to allow access to appropriate portions after weighing competing interests); United States v. Amodeo, 71 F…
…D. 164 (S.D.N.Y.1957) ................................................................................................ 30 Sgambellone v. Wheatley, 165 Misc.2d 954, 630 N.Y.S.2d 835 (N.Y. Sup.Ct. 1995) ...................................................... 17 Silva v. Pioneer Janitorial Servs., Inc., No. CIV.A. 10-11264-JGD, 2011…
Comments