…2020 Tr. 4:3-16. Plaintiff contends that Defendant’s approach contravenes the Court’s ruling, which (as did the Second Circuit) unsealed the documents subject to limited redactions. Given the parties’ disagreement, Plaintiff will send her proposed redactions to…
…ideas that we have come up 17 with -- we have submitted the letter to you, obviously, which 18 poses an approach dealing with the non-parties. One other 19 piece of that, if it would be beneficial to the Court…
…might be at the very bottom of the Non- Party list. The Court would need to make 15 separate rulings before Docket Entry 143 is unsealed. s approach, all Non-Parties mentioned in the First Five Motions would be notified…
…Plaintiff’s counsel proposes an ad hoc approach in which filings appear to be selected in order to speed up review of materials that Plaintiff would like to see unsealed first rather than a review method that favors efficiency and…
…the order that their name appears on the Non-Party list. Id. at 1-2. Under Maxwell’s approach, the public will not have access to those documents, to which they have a First Amendment right of access, for years…
…be unsealed and docketed in the form that they were 8 received from the law enforcement agency. This is also 9 consistent with the approach that the Court of Appeals has 10 taken. Consistent with the Court of Appeals' approach…
…Maxwell’s deposition or Doe 1’s deposition, regardless of whether those motions mention Doe 1 or Doe 2. Plaintiff disagrees with this approach, as the parties agreed and the Court ordered that the Protocol would proceed by Non- Party…
…should do so by only redacting these Does’ names. Dkt. 1237 at 10. Does 55 and 56 reject that approach; instead, they argue that the sealing of their names would be insufficient to anonymize them. Does 55 & 56 Reply Objs…
…they're specifically talking 20 about here. 21 THE COURT: Thank you very much. I will reserve 22 decision. 23 The motion to quash the Epstein -- 24 MR. POE: May I approach the podium, your Honor? 25 THE COURT: Yes…
…employee, (ii) Epstein affiliate, (iii) victim, etc.) so that they can be addressed in groups. Such an approach, however, would delay speeding up the process until after her criminal proceedings,3 and will only to lead to more disputes. Even…
…to allow her defense witnesses to use pseudonyms, as they were not testifying as victims of sexual abuse). “Implicit in this approach is a balancing of the victim’s privacy interest, on one hand, and the public interest in access…
…been categorical and succinct. It was neither. The decision turned on the Second Circuit’s lengthy discussion of the First and Third Circuits’ divergent approaches to the question, when is a mere document transformed into a judicial one? The Third…
…which pertains to a different subject or person, is as well. This approach is compelled by the particularized review set forth by the Court of Appeals. See Brown, 929 F.3d at 49−51. The second category of Sealed Materials consists…
Comments