…whether the party requesting the deposition has had other opportunities to obtain the same information, and whether the burden of a second deposition outweighs its potential benefit.’” Id. (quoting Ganci, 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1330…
…455 at 2. In the interests of judicial economy, the parties believe it would be appropriate to have the benefit of the Court's rulings on these other issues, review the designated testimony in light of such rulings and then…
…Simply put, she should not be allowed to benefit from her obvious failure to properly disclose Ms. Ransome. Ms. Ransome's Testimonv is ot Cumulative And Has Highly Relevant Evidence Defendant also advances the remarkable argument that it is "unlikely…
…for his deliberate violation of the settlement privilege will not be harsh enough to offset the benefit he received by feeding false Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1218-37 Filed 07/15/21 Page 3 of 9 …
…he had no role in issuance of the statement, he has no benefit in the outcome of this litigation and he played no controlling role in its respect. Similarly, there is not any evidence at all to support an adverse…
…fundamentally unfair to allow Giuffre to continue to press these allegations where she and her attorneys have had the full benefit of discovery already conducted concerning these allegations which is in her possession and which is being withheld Dershowitz and…
…Numerous depositions have already been taken by Ms. Giuffre without the benefit of these documents. The window for authenticating the documents through depositions 7 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1332-1 Filed 01/08/24 Page 9…
…make a convoluted legal argument, not to actually seek discoverable information. In light of this, the “burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, considering the needs of the case, the parties' resources, the importance of the…
…for two hour on each subject, up to a total of four hours. The Defendant should not get a benefit from having twice improperly withheld information, by collapsing the two hours needed to address each of these topics into an…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…119 (2d Cir. 2006). The Second Circuit has explained that “documents that directly affect an adjudication and play a significant role in determining litigants’ substantive rights receive the benefit of a relatively strong presumption, while the public interest in other…
…be unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, the requesting party had a prior opportunity in discovery to obtain the information sought, or the burden or expense of additional depositions would outweigh any likely benefit.” In re Weatherford Int'l Sec. Litig., No…
…sanctions, “to ‘ensure that a party will not benefit from its own failure to comply,’ to ‘obtain compliance with a particular order issued,’ and to ‘serve a general deterrent 4 Plaintiff lodged an objection to communications regarding “ongoing” investigations, but…
…followed in this case. While requiring Mr. Epstein to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege in front of the jury will yield not even a marginal benefit to either party, there are substantial countervailing concerns that weigh heavily against requiring Mr…
…be unreasonably cumulative or duplicative, the requesting party had a prior opportunity in discovery to obtain the information sought, or the burden or expense of additional depositions would outweigh any likely benefit.” In re Weatherford Int'l Sec. Litig., No…
…he had no role in issuance of the statement, he has no benefit in the outcome of this litigation and he played no controlling role in its respect. Similarly, there is not any evidence at all to support an adverse…
…add any clarity to the process. Approaching the Does in categories will have the added benefit of having only a few responses and replies due in a particular round as the Objecting Does will be spread out amongst the groups…
…actively participated in the litigation. Indeed, the testimony of Cassell makes clear that the purpose of the litigation was for Plaintiff’s benefit, and that he wanted to do a “good job” for her. Normally, an attorney cannot waive the…
…denying Ms. Giuffre the benefit of being able to use these e- mails at multiple witness depositions. The only “untimeliness” claim that can be made here is against 1111 the Defendant. - The two emails in question are responsive to a…
…lawsuit is lost income. Her Rule 26 disclosure of the basis for calculating these damages was extensive and is worth setting out here for the benefit of the Court: Estimated lost income of $180,000 annually. Present value of $3…
Comments