…foreign or domestic, directly or indirectly held by You, or held on Your behalf or for Your benefit by another individual or entity, including trusts from January 2015 to the Present. RESPONSE: Ms. Maxwell objects to this Request on the…
…on privilege, he wagered that the consequences from this Court for his deliberate violation of the settlement privilege would not be harsh enough to offset the benefit he received by feed ing fa lse information to the press. On December…
…he had no role in issuance of the statement, he has no benefit in the outcome of this litigation and he played no controlling role in its respect. Similarly, there is not any evidence at all to support an adverse…
…fundamentally unfair to allow Giuffre to continue to press these allegations where she and her attorneys have had the full benefit of discovery already conducted concerning these allegations which is in her possession and which is being withheld Dershowitz and…
…Inc., 285 B.R. 101, 109 (E.D.N.Y. 2002) (quoting United States v. Peoples Benefit Life Ins. Co., 271 F.3d 411, 415 (2d Cir. 2001)). Under Rule 24(b), courts in this Circuit consider the following factors…
…Mar. 25, 2021). 3 There is no basis to believe that the protective order or subsequent sealing of documents were imposed solely for Maxwell’s benefit; Judge McMahon discussed “Maxwell[’s] … degree of pro- tection” because she “assume[d]…
…orders is broad. “When the district court invokes its inherent power to sanction misconduct by an attorney that involves that attorney’s violation of a court order or other misconduct that is not undertaken for the client’s benefit, the …
…he had no role in issuance of the statement, he has no benefit in the outcome of this litigation and he played no controlling role in its respect. Similarly, there is not any evidence at all to support an adverse…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…he had no role in issuance of the statement, he has no benefit in the outcome of this litigation and he played no controlling role in its respect. Similarly, there is not any evidence at all to support an adverse…
…But, because he has passed away, his family must confront these allegations and the associated stigma without the benefit of Professor Minsky’s response, let alone an available forum for seeking redress. Providing the media more unsubstantiated allegations, never leveled…
… other than the one selected by the party seeking discovery.” Even among parties, the Court has discretion to impose discovery limitations where the “burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit, considering the needs of the case…
…orders is broad. “When the district court invokes its inherent power to sanction misconduct by an attorney that involves that attorney’s violation of a court order or other misconduct that is not undertaken for the client’s benefit, the …
…issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable. For information to be subject to a request to production…
…issues, and whether the burden or expense of the proposed discovery outweighs its likely benefit. Information within this scope of discovery need not be admissible in evidence to be discoverable. For information to be subject to a request to production…
…therwise, there would exhibit a danger that the court could become a partner in the use of the subpoenaed material to gratify private spite or promote public scandal, with no corresponding assurance of public benefit.” Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc…
…DOC 291 and studying its contents, that he cannot determine which documents implicate him in Epstein's criminal conduct, negotiating the NPA for his own benefit and documents evincing Plaintiffs investigation of him, is disingenuous. DOC 291 and its attachments…
…by the Second Circuit”). These arguments are all unavailing. There is simply no benefit to debating whether documents should be sealed when they are already widely disseminated on the courts’ public dockets. See In re Application to Unseal 98 Cr…
…S.2d at 922. Ms. Maxwell’s case will not “rise or fall” based on whether she can show that Ms. Roberts received a financial benefit from the publication of her story. In any event, Ms. Maxwell may elicit testimony…
…the Court properly applied Davis at the motion to dismiss sta ge, but argues that the third factor, especially , benefits from the evidence presented in the motion for summary judgment. See Def.'s Br. at 32. I n other words…
Comments