…be looking over her shoulder—that is, for reporters lurking in the bushes, ready to pounce with voice recorders and cameras in hand. In recent months, journalists have searched high and low for Maxwell, who had already been maintaining a…
…9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK --------------------------------------------------X ...... ......................................... VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Pla…
…no. 1084.) Prior to receiving Ms. Maxwell’s latest last-minute request, the Court conducted an in camera review of Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre’s proposed redactions to the materials, which are described in Ms. Giuffre’s letter dated July 29…
…MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed the parties’ proposed redactions that were provided to the Court for in camera review on the evening of October 21, 2020. The Court has approved Ms…
…2023, submit to the Court for in camera review an affidavit supporting her assertion that she faces a risk of physical harm in her country of residence and providing detail concerning the hate mail she received. Doe 107's counsel…
…1 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit) Motion to Compel NOTICE of In Camera Submission re: 134 Order,,. 05/04/2016 141 Improper Purpose - In Camera Document filed by Virginia L. Giuffre. Materials …
…modification of the Protective Order in the Criminal Action from Judge Nathan forthwith to permit sharing the information with this Court, ex parte and in camera if necessary, and with the Second Circuit (likewise under seal if necessary). Case…
…2023, submit to the Court for in camera review an affidavit supporting her assertion that she faces a risk of physical harm in her country of residence and providing detail concerning the hate mail she received. Doe 107's counsel…
…# 2 Exhibit, # 3 Exhibit) Motion to Compel NOTICE of In Camera Submission re: 134 Order. 05/04/2016 141 – Judicial Document Document filed by Virginia L. Giuffre. (In Camera Materials) …
…Dkt. 1087 at 2–3. Nor did Maxwell’s counsel offer to provide the Court with a competing set of proposed redactions for in camera review until the afternoon of the Court-ordered deadline to unseal. Even then, Maxwell’s…
…That's troubling as well because we went through 2 litigation in this case about our access to alleged 3 public-interest privileged documents that were not turned over 4 to us but were submitted in camera to the Court…
…to the world that she “cried rape,”13 and to humiliate her family (including three minor children) by publicizing she was the victim of domestic abuse in 2015. As the Court saw during its in camera review, Defendant and Mr…
…ordered to produce all documents relating to alleged law enforcement inquiries other than Plaintiff’s own statements (which would be provided for in camera review), she simply provided all documents relating to alleged law enforcement inquires for in camera review…
…on the record. I'm not asking this Court to do 23 that, but in Florida where I practice more, most of the time, 24 judges routinely allow me to participate in in-camera 25 examinations -- videos, documents, hearings, testimony …
…April 21, 2016 . ?laintiff was directed to submit the relevant materials for in camera review. Plaintiff did so on April 28 1 2016. Plaintiff filed her motion to compel Defendant to answer deposition questions on May 5, 2016. Oral argument…
…public. At the very least, the Court should conduct an in camera review of any joint defense agreements that exist to determine their relevance to both the defamation claim and the multiple affirmative defenses offered by Defendant. See Steuben Foods…
…ordered to produce all documents relating to alleged law enforcement inquiries other than Plaintiff’s own statements (which would be provided for in camera review), she simply provided all documents relating to alleged law enforcement inquires for in camera review…
… Plaintiff’s gamesmanship is clear: she wants to get Ms. Maxwell on a videotaped deposition camera, show her documents that she has not had a chance to review either because they were not produced or because they were produced so…
…Privilege 57‐1:3 Exhibits 1‐3 3.14.16 Defendant's Notice of Submission of Declaration in Support of Defendant's In Camera Submission in 77 3.31.16 Opposition to Plaintiffs Motion to Compel the Production of Documents…
…seems to be 6 cumulative. It's also prejudicial, and it also denies my 7 ability to confront and cross-examine a witness who is 8 appearing for the camera and acting. So that's Kliman. 9 Jansen, your Honor…