…designations. May 4, 2107, Pre-trial Conference to address any outstanding issues including confidentiality. WHEREFORE, the parties request that the Court adopt the proposed schedule and modify the Court' s Order of October 3, 2016 to reflect the above deadlines…
…because Ms. Giuffre corrected some typographical and spelling issues. 2 confidentiality designations of that type of discovery would wrongfully allow the abuser to hide behind a claim of confidentiality. Purposes and Limitations: Ms. Giuffre’s proposed revisions include…
…C. All Documents Were Redacted Appropriately By the Law Enforcement Agencies ........... 8 II. PLAINTIFF HAS WAIVED ANY ARGUMENT AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY ................ 9 A. Plaintiff Failed to Timely Move this Court to Uphold Her Designation of the Documents as Confidential ...........................................…
…Which Disqualifies Him from Relief.................................................................... 22 4. Under This Court’s Order, Non-Parties Cannot Challenge Confidentiality Designations and Dershowitz has Already Agreed to be Bound by the…
…case. In unsealing the summary judgment record, the Court of Appeals redacted “deposition responses concerning intimate matters where the questions were likely only permitted— and the responses only compelled—because of a strong expectation of continued confidentiality.” Brown v. Maxwell…
…the hundreds of interested Non-Parties together with Ms. Maxwell have every right and reason to expect that the promises of confidentiality afforded by a Protective Order, to which Plaintiff and 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document…
…that a non-party cannot seek to overturn the protective order as follows: “The Protective Order states that parties can object to the confidentiality designations: “A party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION by giving written notice…
…by its redactions, implicitly held that the deposition contained “responses concerning intimate matters where the questions were likely only permitted – and the responses only compelled – because of a strong expectation of continued confidentiality.” See Resp. at 5 (“this court should…
…but a confidentiality order shall be entered. Regarding the deposition: The depo shall be limited to 4 hours without prejudice to request additional time in the future. The Defendant can be present at the depo. The depo will be taken…
…pages ) but not in others (e.g., page ). Both of these two alleged victims are represented by counsel and sought confidentiality for their depositions; neither has yet been afforded notice or an opportunity to be heard with respect to this…
…and 23. The Motion is denied as to the remaining Requests. b. A Confidentiality Order shall be entered. c. The deposition of Jane Doe No. 3 shall be limited to 4 hours without prejudice to request for add itional time…
…Which Disqualifies Him from Relief.................................................................... 22 4. Under This Court’s Order, Non-Parties Cannot Challenge Confidentiality Designations and Dershowitz has Already Agreed to be Bound by the…
…9 I think it's more like listing witnesses. So I would say that 10 the plaintiff should supply all residences. 11 The Dershowitz deposition will be produced under the 12 confidentiality provision. As I read what I've been…
… 42:178. Public-interest privilege West’s Key Number Digest West’s Key Number Digest, Privileged Communications and Confidentiality 357 A public-interest privilege, which permits appropriate parties to protect information from ordinary disclosure, inheres in certain co…
…as here, the disputed documents are filed in support of or in opposition to a discovery motion other than a motion as to the discoverability or confidentiality of the disputed documents themselves, they are properly Case 1:15-cv…
…allowed the parties to provide discovery on highly private and sensitive subjects that could not be disclosed to the public without a further order of this Court. The Protective Order “provided confidentiality for information the parties determine would ‘improperly annoy…
…and redacting all substantive references to them, pending disposition of this application. Although I have erred on the side of strict confidentiality to avoid any semblance of violating the Court’s Protective Order, I of course do not believe that…
…C. All Documents Were Redacted Appropriately By the Law Enforcement Agencies ........... 8 II. PLAINTIFF HAS WAIVED ANY ARGUMENT AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY ................ 9 A. Plaintiff Failed to Timely Move this Court to Uphold Her Designation of the Documents as Confidential ...........................................…
…I shall not distinguish between those two companies for the purposes of this judgment (because it is not necessary to do so) and shall treat all relevant copyright and confidentiality rights as being vested in what I will call "USP"…
…v. Sprint Corp., 407 F.3d 560, 562 (2d Cir. 2005) (“It is presumptively unfair for courts to modify protective orders which assure confidentiality and upon which the parties have reasonably relied.”); see also Martindell v. Int’l Tel. & Tel…
Comments