gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1097.0_1.pdf PDF
…DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Co…
…DERSHOWITZ, Defendant. VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Co…
…teams set up by Total and HOSL. The Total defendants and HOSL resist the applications on the B ground that the investigations fall within the rule in Waugh v British Railways Board [1980] AC 521 and are covered by litigation…
…We covered a lot of topics and we both had a number of other things to do. 1 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 288-1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 2 of 4 In any…
…2) the need of the party for the documents, 3) the breadth of the document request, 4) the time period covered by it, 5) the particularity with which the documents are described, and 6) the burden imposed. Id. 1 …
…2) the need of the party for the documents, 3) the breadth of the document request, 4) the time period covered by it, 5) the particularity with which the documents are described, and 6) the burden imposed. Id. 1 …
…08/31/20 Page 2 of 3 of any comments received.” (Id. at 2.)1 The Court writes to provide that update. Nonparties were permitted to submit comments on the proposed disclosure to Mr. Dershowitz no later than August 25…
…request in that it is overly broad and seeks confidential financial information. Ms. Giuffre objects to this interrogatory in that it seeks information covered by confidentiality provisions. Ms. Giuffre objects to this information in that any payment information for the…
…957), and states as follows. INTRODUCTION1 Ms. Maxwell has argued that counsel for Ms. Giuffre have been ordered by this Court to immediately destroy certain materials covered by the protective order in this matter. Counsel for Mr. Giuffre stand ready…
…all refer to it? 20 MR. MILLER: We refer to it as Jane Doe. 21 THE COURT: Okay. 22 MR. MILLER: Let me back up and give you background. 23 THE COURT: No, no. Thanks very much. 24 MR. MILLER: …
…on the subject matters she claims are raised by these two emails, and Plaintiff did in fact question Ms. Maxwell on the subjects covered by the emails. Moreover, despite having access to other email communications that are similar in nature…
…2) the need of the party for the documents, 3) the breadth of the document request, 4) the time period covered by it, 5) the particularity with which the documents are described, and 6) the burden imposed. Id. 1 …
…Plaintiff, v. 15-cv-07433-RWS Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER Upon a showing of good cause in support of the entry of a protective order to protect the discovery and dissemination of conf…
…Objection by arguing for un-sealing. Any argument by an Original Party for sealing would be covered by 2(f) and not in opposition to the Non-Party. 2(f): The Court in its Order at ¶ 5 recognized the right…
…I'm going to 8 object. That relates directly to 9 financial information, so it's 10 covered by New York law with 11 respect to nonparty witnesses. 12 Q. What are the names of your 13 parents? 14 A…
…Khan, 821 F.2d 90 (2d Cir. 1987) ...................................................................... 4-5 United States v. Song, 436 F.3d 137, 139 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................... 3 Upstate Shredding, LLC v. Ne. Ferrous, Inc., No. 312CV1015LEKDEP, 2016 WL 865299, at *13 (N.D.N…
…here and they raise different standards and considerations. The Martindell court held that the government “may not . . . simply by picking up the telephone or writing a letter to the court . . . insinuate itself into a private civil lawsuit between others.” Id…
…allegations—Maxwell and Epstein are convicted criminals for their participation in the sex trafficking at issue. Had Epstein not suddenly died upon the release of this Court’s summary judgment records, while jailed on a federal indictment for sex trafficking…
…Maxwell’s assertions that the presumption of access is overcome by the fact that the documents were covered by a protective order or because they relate to third parties are shopworn red herrings that the Second Circuit has repeatedly rejected…
…3, Ms. Giuffre struck the word “implicates” and replaced it with “is covered by” because many things can “implicate” but only those things that are actually “covered by a common law and statutory privacy protection” should be deemed “confidential”. Ms…
…Given that in the prior depositions of Ms. Maxwell, counsel for Plaintiff has repeatedly covered the same questions, we believe that there is a high likelihood that this repetitive duplicative questioning will occur again, necessitating objections by counsel to enforce …
Comments