…In order to investigate, as we would be obligated to do and 3 entitled to do, your Honor, we would be forced to engage in 4 cross-border discovery. A simple Rule 45 subpoena would not 5 suffice, your Honor. …
…02-17-2017 Defendant’s Objections to Plaintiff's Cross Designations................................................ 8 03-28-2017 Response to Defendant’s Objections to Plaintiff's Designations...................................... 9 03-28-2017 Notice of filing Typographical Errors..................................................…
…02-17-2017 Defendant’s Objections to Plaintiff's Cross Designations................................................ 8 03-28-2017 Response to Defendant’s Objections to Plaintiff's Designations...................................... 9 03-28-2017 Notice of filing Typographical Errors..................................................…
…Page 5 of 12 Page 4 1 I N D E X 2 WITNESS: PAGE: 3 JEFFREY EDWARD EPSTEIN 4 DIRECT EXAMINATION 8 BY MR. CASSELL: 5 CRO…
…Ms. McCawley, to 18 allow Mr. Scarola a couple questions on 19 examination on cross and then my ruling is going 20 to be as follows: You can go ahead and ask 21 whatever questions you want, Mr. Scarola, at…
…obligation to respond to each interrogatory including its related subparts, separately and fully. A submission by that party's counsel which cross-references pleadings and exhibits is simply not an answer to that interrogatory by that party. It must be …
…1996) ............................................. 7 Fausto v. Credigy Svcs. Corp., 251 F.R.D. 427 (N.D.Ca. 2008) ........................................ 7 Hartman v. Am. Red Cross, No. 09–1302, 2010 WL 1882002 (C.D.Ill. May 11, 2010) .... 7 Lane v. Smith, Jr., 84…
…obligation to respond to each interrogatory including its related subparts, separately and fully. A submission by that party's counsel which cross-references pleadings and exhibits is simply not an answer to that interrogatory by that party. It must be …
…383 South University Street BY MR. CASSELL: Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 5 5 Phone: 801.585.5202 CROSS-EXAMINATION 275 6 BY MR. PAGLIUCA: …
…383 South University Street BY MR. CASSELL: Salt Lake City, Utah 84112 5 5 Phone: 801.585.5202 CROSS-EXAMINATION 275 E-mail: [email protected] 6 BY MR. PAGLIUCA: …
…Uete1..UVC1 VVCI C U 1
…Thus, the factors to be considered have simply been moved to a new number with cross reference. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1090-18 Filed 07/30/20 Page 6 of 11 Weighing these factors, there…
…2900217, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 4, 2007) (Sweet, J.) (denying motion and cross motion based on failure to confer, noting “[m]ere correspondence, absent exigent circumstances not present here, does not satisfy the requirement”); Myers v. Andzel…
…witness in this case is 9 highly relevant. If she came forward because she has a money 10 motive to be a witness in this case, that is motive and that is 11 cross-examination material, your Honor. She testified…
…he is not, then there is no rebuttal witness, and none to cross examine. II. WAS NOT PROPERLY “REFRESHED” AND THE READING OF THE HEARSAY POLICE REPORT IS INADMISSABLE The use of the deposition testimony of , and the reading or…
…no need to resort to such recorded testimony. Ms. Giuffre will appear at trial at testify during her case-in-chief and, of course, be cross-examined by defense counsel. In addition, Ms. Giuffre will be available to be a…
…Thus, the factors to be considered have simply been moved to a new number with cross reference. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-20 Filed 01/03/24 Page 6 of 11 Weighing these factors, there…
…Thus, the factors to be considered have simply been moved to a new number with cross reference. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-20 Filed 01/03/24 Page 6 of 11 Weighing these factors, there…
…benefit.” Thus, the factors to be considered have simply been moved to a new number with cross reference. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 189 Filed 06/06/16 Page 6 of 11 Weighing these factors, there…