…privacy, and (3) requesting excerpts of sealed materials that mention them for their review (the “September 25 Email”). The parties dispute the procedural import of the September 25 Email under the Protocol governing the unsealing of documents in this action…
…Non-Party’s Failure to Object As an initial matter, the parties dispute whether the Court should unseal in the next set of motions the names of Non- Parties other than Does 1 and 2. Plaintiff contends “[t]he names…
…we said, we omitted it from our proposed List of Decided Motions. We took the Court’s acceptance of Doc.1007-1 at the January 16 hearing as an implicit resolution of the dispute. See Doc.1021, at 10:22…
…him. The Judge has required for conferrals to occur after a writing which spells out the 2 EXHIBIT 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 288-1 Filed 07/15/16 Page 3 of 4 nature of a dispute…
…an approach, however, would delay speeding up the process until after her criminal proceedings,3 and will only to lead to more disputes. Even deciding what groups should exist and what to call them will likely lead to disagreement, and…
…her burden of showing that the questions asked are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This is a case in which sexual activities lie at the heart of the issues in dispute. As a result…
…her burden of showing that the questions asked are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This is a case in which sexual activities lie at the heart of the issues in dispute. As a result…
…DE 1108, at 1. This next phase specifically contemplates individualized review for each affected non-party, and a provision is made for an evidentiary hearing to resolve any factual disputes as to each non-party. See id. at 3. We…
…her burden of showing that the questions asked are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This is a case in which sexual activities lie at the heart of the issues in dispute. As a result…
…1999) (stating that a majority of courts that have considered whether Fed.R.Evid. 412 is applicable to discovery “have found that Rule 412 has significance in the resolution of a discovery dispute”). In Barta v. City & County of Honolulu…
…her burden of showing that the questions asked are not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. This is a case in which sexual activities lie at the heart of the issues in dispute. As a result…