gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1328.16.pdf PDF
…Object to th e fonn. 5 females thnt was trafficked basically a1·011n1l the 6 A Fi fth . 6 globe to be sexually exploited and abused; is 7 Q This ls n cnll from you inclicnting that 7 that correct? …
…Object to th e fonn. 5 females thnt was trafficked basically a1·011n1l the 6 A Fi fth . 6 globe to be sexually exploited and abused; is 7 Q This ls n cnll from you inclicnting that 7 that correct? …
…Id. The district court affirmed the magistrate’s quashing the subpoena. The court explained that, whereas in von Bulow all of the information at issue had been gathered by Reynolds “before she formed any intent to distribute information to the…
… In May 2009, Ms. Roberts filed a civil suit against Mr. Epstein, in which she alleged that Mr. Epstein required that she “be sexually exploited by Defendant’s adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional…
… In May 2009, Ms. Roberts filed a civil suit against Mr. Epstein, in which she alleged that Mr. Epstein required that she “be sexually exploited by Defendant’s adult male peers, including royalty, politicians, academicians, businessmen, and/or other professional…
…unsealed. Plaintiff’s list is identical to Defendant’s list, except that Defendant has failed to include two decided motions: Dkts. 468 & 567. As Plaintiff explained in her February 5, 2020 letter, Dkt. 1029, Judge Sweet decided both motions, and…
…to raise similar objections. Professor Dershowitz has explained that he is prepared to abide by any applicable court order subject only to reserving the right to seek relief from the Court as to particular items if appropriate, a right which…
…to learn that this clash of the legal titans has been averted, preventing the allegations on all sides from being explored in greater depth in open court. UPDATE (4/9/2016, 10:55 a.m.): Here is the statement of…
…and Jane Doe #2 even though federal charges were never filed. DE 189. The Court explained that because the NPA barred prosecution of crimes committed against them by Epstein, they had “standing” to assert violations of the CVRA rights. Id…
…Tr. of July 1, 2021 Ruling at 7:9–14. As the Court explained during its most recent ruling, if there is identifying information about Doe himself that he contends must be redacted, he may request that relief under seal…
…DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 31 Filed 01/28/16 Page 3 of 22 3 G1ETGIUA 1 statements that are referenced but never explained in 2 paragraphs 31 and 34?…
…P . C. (212) 805-0300 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1325-18 Filed 01/04/24 Page 4 of 23 3 GlETGIUA 1 statements that are referenced but never explained in 2 paragraphs 31 and 34? In…
…and Jane Doe #2 even though federal charges were never filed. DE 189. The Court explained that because the NPA barred prosecution of crimes committed against them by Epstein, they had “standing” to assert violations of the CVRA rights. Id…
…and Jane Doe #2 even though federal charges were never filed. DE 189. The Court explained that because the NPA barred prosecution of crimes committed against them by Epstein, they had “standing” to assert violations of the CVRA rights. Id…
…provide a vehicle for this Court to protect a non-party from a harassing, burdensome and unnecessary subpoena. As explained below, non-party Jane Doe No. 3 should be protected from having to be deposed in this matter or produce…
…would either enable or require her to do so.” Id. Plaintiff never responded. She also has not explained when or how Ms. Maxwell “acknowledged” her “plans to call Mr. Gow for testimony at trial,” nor why that is relevant to…
…of modification. As the court in EDPM explained: An examination of Second Circuit case law reveals the following factors are relevant when determining whether a party has reasonably relied on the protective order: (1) the scope of the protective order;…
…response to Dershowitz’s intervention motion. McCawley Decl., Exhibit 3, Response to Motion to Intervene.3 The response explained that the allegations against Dershowitz were relevant to at least eight separate issues in the CVRA case. Id. at 18-26…
…The government has not provided Maxwell with a copy of the subpoena, but the record shows that the subpoena was incredibly broad and, as explained below, ultimately unlawful. The subpoena violated the Fourth Amendment because it was overbroad and because…
…01/05/24 Page 13 of 31 innocence. But this inference is inconsistent with Ms. Giuffre’s description of the manuscript, in which she explained “[n]ot everything in it is – not everything is in there . . ..” McCawley Dec. at 13…
…07433-LAP Document 1206-2 Filed 02/04/21 Page 18 of 23 had in the Chemical Bank case. In no uncertain terms, explained why she had haled the prosecutor back into court: Ex. E, p 2. In Chemical Bank…
Comments