gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1287.0.pdf PDF
…request therein, is resolved by the Court. Document # of Page Line(s) Identifier Redaction Requested Transcript 1283 5 24-25 All text, as explained in Motion No text, as explained in Motion 1283 6 …
Found 18 results
for “exploited”
in 149ms
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1204.0.pdf PDF
…Preska: I write in reply to the letters filed by plaintiff and the Miami Herald in opposition to Ms. Maxwell’s limited motion for reconsideration. As explained below, neither letter appreciates the stakes, and both misunderstand the basis for Ms…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1329.0.pdf PDF
…the alphabetical order of 1 With respect to the remaining Does, the Court has explained its reasons for declining to unseal their names, and any party dissatisfied with those reasons can appeal to the Court of Appeals. 2 the list…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1099.0.pdf PDF
…7 days, and that the Original Parties file letters with the Court 21 days thereafter advising the Court of any further suggested changes to the Protocol based on how many Non-Parties request excerpts.1 1 As explained below, Plaintiff…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1128.0_4.pdf PDF
…172 199, and 230 (ECF No. 1068-1) later today. By order dated October 19, 2020, after expedited briefing and a hearing held on October 13, 2020, the Second Circuit affirmed this Court’s order (ECF No. 1126), rejecting Maxwell…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1135.0_6.pdf PDF
…regarding her proposed redactions during a telephone conference at 1 p.m. today. While undersigned counsel explained the bases for her disagreement and pointed out other areas that should be redacted, Ms. McCawley simply stated that she disagreed without explanation. …
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1130.0_3.pdf PDF
…172 199, and 230 (ECF No. 1068-1) later today. By order dated October 19, 2020, after expedited briefing and a hearing held on October 13, 2020, the Second Circuit affirmed this Court’s order (ECF No. 1126), rejecting Maxwell…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1155.0_2.pdf PDF
…19/20 Page 3 of 13 criminal matter, this Court held, “[a]gain, Ms. Maxwell has relied on [ipse] dixits and has not explained how the sealed material, if released, could, as she posits, ‘inappropriately influence potential witnesses or victims.’”…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1068.0.pdf PDF
…to be considered under the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions are discovery motions that were resolved by Judge Sweet. ECF No. 1044 at 1. Therefore, as the Second Circuit explained, “[t]he remaining sealed materials at issue here . . …
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1020.0.pdf PDF
…frequently was the case, numerous interests could be identified sufficient to rebut the presumption of access. The three counsel of record completed this project within the time constraints imposed by the Court in this expedited proceeding. That is not a…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1199.16_1.pdf PDF
…or Independent of the Protective Order Ms. Giuffre explained in detail why her application to the Court is timely filed under the Protective Order [DE 62], and will not burden the Court with a recitation of such details and arguments…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1250.0.pdf PDF
…id. As the Court explained: [T]he availability of a transcript of the deposition does not in our view necessarily eliminate or even diminish a party’s privacy interest in the publication or copying of a video of those proceedings…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1166.0_1.pdf PDF
…non-intimate matters does not bear on whether Ms. Maxwell’s interests have overcome the “lesser” presumption here. As explained below, the presumption is overcome as to the July 2016 deposition in toto, not just as to questions concerning “intimate…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1156.0.pdf PDF
…3. This Court has already explained that the unsealing process operates independently from requests to modify the Protective Order, and noted that “the proposed modification of the protective order would threaten to undercut the carefully planned unsealing process in Maxwell…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1335.5.pdf PDF
…or Independent of the Protective Order Ms. Giuffre explained in detail why her application to the Court is timely filed under the Protective Order [DE 62], and will not burden the Court with a recitation of such details and arguments…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.980.0.pdf PDF
…trial, or in connection with dispositive motions such as motions for dismissal or summary judgment.” Id. As the Court of Appeals explained, a district court’s authority to oversee discovery and control the evidence introduced at trial is “ancillary to…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1182.0_1.pdf PDF
…protecting non-parties’ privacy interests. Id. at 5. As the Court explained, the disclosure sought by Mr. Dershowitz “without the extensive input from the nonparties that is provided for by the unsealing process in Maxwell” would threaten to undermine those…
gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1253.0.pdf PDF
…929 F.3d 41, 53 (2d Cir. 2019) (emphasis added). As the Brown court explained, “[a] document is . . . relevant to the performance of the judicial function if it would reasonably have the tendency to influence a district court’s ruling…
Comments