gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1240.0.pdf PDF
…Reilly, 307 F. Supp. 3d 161, 168 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621–22 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). Those factors and the harm of disclosure must be identified with specificity…
…Reilly, 307 F. Supp. 3d 161, 168 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621–22 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). Those factors and the harm of disclosure must be identified with specificity…
…818, 826 (2d Cir. 1997). Accordingly, non-party objectors like Doe 133 bear the burden of identifying with specificity countervailing interests that outweigh the presumption of public access. See Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621, 628…
…v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)........................................................................................ 3, 7, 9 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)................................................................................. 5 Mokhiber v. Davis, …