…24, 2003) ............................. 10 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................. 2, 14 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) .............................................................…
…passim Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ........................................................................................ 10, 11, 12 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) .............................................................................. passim Martindell…
…7, 10, 13 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................... 3, 4 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) ..................................................................... 4, 5, 10, 14 Rotger v.…
…3 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) .................................................................................................. 2, 4 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) ....................................................................................... 4 Nixon v…
…O’Reilly, 307 F. Supp. 3d 161, 168 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621–22 (S.D.N.Y. 2011). Those factors and the harm of disclosure must be identified with…
…v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ........................................................................................................... 4, 6, 7 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) ...............................................................................................…
…sealing (and unsealing) motions without soliciting objections from third parties who were mentioned in the documents. See, e.g., Jane Doe v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Case Number 1-22-cv-10018 (S.D.N.Y.); Jane Doe v…
…818, 826 (2d Cir. 1997). Accordingly, non-party objectors like Doe 133 bear the burden of identifying with specificity countervailing interests that outweigh the presumption of public access. See Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621, 628…
…Does 55 & 56 Reply Objs. 2-3. It is the Does’ burden to identify concrete, countervailing interests that outweigh the presumption of public access. See Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616, 621, 628–30 (S.D.N…
…Jan. 3, 2000) (holding that because “alternative service by means of certified mail reasonably insures actual receipt of the subpoena by the witness, the ‘delivery’ requirement of Rule 45 will be met”); JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. IDW Grp.…
…v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)........................................................................................ 3, 7, 9 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011)................................................................................. 5 Mokhiber v. Davis, …
…Jan. 3, 2000) (holding that because “alternative service by means of certified mail reasonably insures actual receipt of the subpoena by the witness, the ‘delivery’ requirement of Rule 45 will be met”); JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. IDW Grp.…
…Jan. 3, 2000) (holding that because “alternative service by means of certified mail reasonably insures actual receipt of the subpoena by the witness, the ‘delivery’ requirement of Rule 45 will be met”); JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. IDW Grp.…
…only where the party seeking to seal the documents identifies with specificity competing and compelling interests in closure, and the court determines that those interests outweigh the presumption of access. See Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616…