…The Intervenors’ requests to unseal should be denied. A. Intervenors’ First Proposition of Law: For minor victims of sexual abuse, “redactions should be applied sparingly to shield only information that would identify those who have not already been publicly identified…
…good faith basis for keeping the details of the rape of a 14 year old girl, and the reactions of Ms. Giuffre' s minor children to domestic violence, outside of the public realm. See May 18, 2016 letter from J…
…The task of identifying and making specific redactions in such a substantial volume is perilous; the consequences of even a seemingly minor error may be grave and are irrevocable. Moreover, although I share the majority’s concern about avoiding delay…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social- Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…pending motion to intervene and to unseal documents. 2. In my previous declaration, I characterized the offenses to which Jeffrey Epstein pleaded guilty as “involving sex with minors” (¶ 7) and “related to sex with minors” (¶ 10). These statements were imprecise…
…is attached in both a redlined version and a clean version (See McCawley Decl. at Exhibit 5), addresses the following important issues: Opening Paragraph: Given the fact that this case involves sexual abuse allegations of a minor child, Ms…
…age* 344) minor* 345) daily* w/10 mail* 346) daily* w/10 news* 347) lie* 348) obvious* w/10 lie* 349) sex w/3 toy* 350) nipple* 351) schoolgirl 352) school w/3 girl 353) us w/3 att* 354…
…nor disseminate them to third parties. They contain personal, sensitive, and embarrassing information. Many of them also concern minors and a victim of sexual assault; therefore, they are protected by various state statutes. Ms. Giuffre requests that this Court maintain…
… That's a black redaction of the 19 name of the minor and there is -- I will 20 represent for the record that's what it is. 21 You can contest that but I'm not asking about 22 the…
…outcome is particularly likely in the wake of the recent media frenzy about some supposed “Epstein List” and the mass speculation about the identities of those on it. The Document includes minor victims, health care providers, members of law enforcement…
…mandate, the Second Circuit specifically made these materials available on its own docket, subject to what it held were appropriate redactions for personally identifying information, names of alleged minor victims of sexual abuse, and deposition responses disclosing intimate matters. Id…
…the Southern District of Florida (the “Office”), the Office was recused by the Department of Justice from prospective responsibility for any criminal investigation or potential prosecution relating to Jeffrey Epstein’s alleged sexual activities with minor females. As a result…
…The task of identifying and making specific redactions in such a substantial volume is perilous; the consequences of even a seemingly minor error may be grave and are irrevocable. Moreover, although I share the majority’s concern about avoiding delay…
…93, and 151. Finally, the Parties have largely agreed to revisions to the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions, with one minor disagreement. Attached as Exhibit A hereto is Plaintiff’s proposed version, in redline to the current version…
…1999. .................................... 56 2. The January 2015 statement accurately denied that Ms. Maxwell “regularly participate[d] in Epstein’s sexual exploitation of minors” and that “the Government knows” such fact. ..................…
…without redaction after ninety (90) calendar days. This process may only be used to redact the following personal data identifiers: Social Security numbers; dates of birth; minors’ names; and financial account numbers. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2…
…As the newspapers suggest, it is unlikely that the entirety of these documents should properly be sealed, especially where none of the witnesses are minors. Moreover, the Court seems to have misunderstood Intervenor’s motion to unseal. Intervenor did not…
Comments