…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
…I think, to -- or a 16 misunderstanding of sort of conflating Rule 32 and Rule 804. 17 Rule 804 of course deals with unavailability as defined under 18 the Federal Rules of Evidence for hearsay purposes, which is 19 different…
…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
…there. Using shorthand, they applied the sole purpose test. The judgment of the majority is based on a fallacy, based on a misunderstanding of Anderson v. Bank of British Columbia B (1876) 2 Ch.D. 644: see at pp. 687…
Comments