gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.103.2.pdf PDF
…ESQ. APRIL 13, 2016 PAGE 2 If you understood my comments during our telephone conversation to have any broader or different meaning, I apologize for the misunderstanding. Sincerely yours, Wifredo A. Ferrer …
…ESQ. APRIL 13, 2016 PAGE 2 If you understood my comments during our telephone conversation to have any broader or different meaning, I apologize for the misunderstanding. Sincerely yours, Wifredo A. Ferrer …
…Epstein's location request, however, in an abundance of caution so that there is no misunderstanding, I have copied 1 Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 223-6 Filed 06/16/16 Page 3 of 4 counsel for…
…false allegations that she was sexually abused by Ms. Maxwell. Plaintiff spends the remainder of her opposition selectively misunderstanding applicable federal and New York state defamation law. When correctly applying the law, it is clear that there are ample grounds…
…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
… but, it was clearly just that – a miscommunication and misunderstanding on where things stood. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1327-12 Filed 01/05/24 Page 6 of 11 tremendous stretch, I can agree to them…
…it was clearly just that – a miscommunication and misunderstanding on where things stood. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1202-1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 6 of 11 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1202-1…
…SCHULTZ: Sorry, your Honor. No. I think that's 24 a misunderstanding. What they received "ten minutes before" 25 were clips of the video. The entire video was produced well in SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 …
…in reporting on this case. Fortunately for the public, this is not law.7 2.0 The Public’s First Amendment Rights Must Not be Denied In misunderstanding Mr. Cernovich’s motives and conflating him with Prof. Dershowitz, Plaintiff mischaracterizes…
…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
…SCHULTZ: Sorry, your Honor. No. I think that's 24 a misunderstanding. What they received "ten minutes before" 25 were clips of the video. The entire video was produced well in SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 …
…do not exist; a misreading of Ms. Maxwell’s response; or a misunderstanding of the facts or law. The Court should deny the Motion to Compel. ARGUMENT I. The objections and responses to the RFPs are proper. A. RFP No…
…it was clearly just that – a miscommunication and misunderstanding on where things stood. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1202-1 Filed 01/27/21 Page 6 of 11 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1202-1…
…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
… but, it was clearly just that – a miscommunication and misunderstanding on where things stood. 4 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 320 Filed 08/01/16 Page 6 of 11 tremendous stretch, I can agree to them in…
…Ms. Guiffre to accommodate Mr. Epstein'S location request, however, in an abundance of caution so that there is no misunderstanding, I have copied counsel for Ms. Maxwell for whom Mr. Epstein is in a joint defense agreement with, to…
…13 this matter has been resolved. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, I think there was a 15 misunderstanding with respect -- 16 THE COURT: I was sure. 17 MS. McCAWLEY: Dr. Olsen has been noticed for 18 deposition in Colorado already…
…different metadata it must be produced. Defendant’s misguided argument that Plaintiff has artificially inflated the volume of her document production by producing “duplicate” documents reveals a misunderstanding of basic electronic discovery law and practices. Plaintiff utilized an electronic deduplication…
…there. Using shorthand, they applied the sole purpose test. The judgment of the majority is based on a fallacy, based on a misunderstanding of Anderson v. Bank of British Columbia B (1876) 2 Ch.D. 644: see at pp. 687…
Comments