…Order. INTRODUCTION The Protective Order requires the destruction or return of all “Confidential”-designated materials. This action was terminated more than eighteen months ago when the parties reached a settlement and stipulated to dismissal, and the Court dismissed the case…
…Similarly, the replies of the non-parties would have been submitted at least six months ago and thus the issues would have been at least fully briefed. But, because of the modification requested by the original parties after the Protocol…
…about whether Dershowitz had been involved with massages by young girls; x refusals by Jeffrey Epstein to discuss Dershowitz’s involvement but instead to invoke his Fifth Amendment right. - Id. at 26-38. Several months later, on April 7, 2015…
… 2. Epstein shall make a binding recommendation that the Court impose a thirty (30) month sentence to be dividc,d u foUows: (a) Epstein :1ball be sentcnccd to consecutive term, of twelve (12) months and six (6) months in COWlty…
…b identified co-conspirators - when asked questions about whether with massages by young girls; • refusals by Jeffrey Epstein to discuss involvement but instead to invoke his Fifth Amendment right. Id. at 26-38. Several <…
…The parties and non-parties should not be permitted to delay the process by the submission of memoranda that were due over six months ago. Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1226 Filed 08/04/21 Page 3…
…about whether Dershowitz had been involved with massages by young girls; x refusals by Jeffrey Epstein to discuss Dershowitz’s involvement but instead to invoke his Fifth Amendment right. - Id. at 26-38. Several months later, on April 7, 2015…
…Motions should be unsealed before moving onto the next five. The public has a presumptive right to access these documents. The Second Circuit remanded this matter nearly 10 months ago. Plaintiff therefore contends that, despite the burdens of this process…
…2014, despite having had four months to provide a position, the Government responded by email to counsel that it was seeking more time, indicating that the Government understood that victims’ counsel might need to file a motion with the court…
…2014, despite having had four months to provide a position, the Government responded by email to counsel that it was seeking more time, indicating that the Government understood that victims’ counsel might need to file a motion with the court…
…MS. McCAWLEY: This is Christine Walz on behalf of the 15 Intervenors. 16 We think that the proposal would in fact actually 17 extend the process into a month-long endeavor without any 18 reasonable tie to any COVID slowdown…
Comments