…Court regarding unsealing, the Court’s protocol and legal precedent dictate that the absence of such participation should not factor negatively into the Court’s balancing of considerations – as it is ultimately the responsibility of this Court, and not the…
…Since July 2008, I have been involved in important and precedent-setting crime victims’ rights litigation in the Southern District of Florida trying to protect the rights of various victims under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S…
…Since July 2008, I have been involved in important and precedent-setting crime victims’ rights litigation in the Southern District of Florida trying to protect the rights of various victims under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S…
…Since July 2008, I have been involved in important and precedent-setting crime victims’ rights litigation in the Southern District of Florida trying to protect the rights of various victims under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act (CVRA), 18 U.S…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…is well within this Court's province to award severe sanctions against him. Mr. Dershowitz's deliberate and willful behavior is sufficient under the contro lling precedent for this Court to strike his pleadings in this case. Mercer v. Raine…
…subject matter” of the communications. Plaintiff cites three cases from the Southern District of 15 New York, describes them as “controlling precedent” and demands an in camera review of the subject documents. First, Ms. Maxwell’s privilege log satisfies the…
…25 weights of presumption based on the extent to which they were relied upon in resolving [a] motion [for summary judgment].”18 Second, in contravention of our precedent, the District Court failed to review the documents individually and produce “specific…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…in that case held that any finding of waiver should be made with “caution.” Id. at 228. Rather than cite this controlling Second Circuit precedent, Defendant relies on a 2002 case from this Court applying the Hearn “at issue” doctrine…
…and useful in the judicial process in order for it to be designated a judicial document. Id. Brown was building on Amodeo I’s holding when it said, “As our precedent makes clear, a court “‘perform[s] the judicial function’ . …
…Otherwise Improper Content Are Non-Judicial Plaintiff does not appear to contest that filings with frivolous, scandalous, or otherwise improper content, which is predicated on the express language of governing precedent. See, e.g., Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 122…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…25 weights of presumption based on the extent to which they were relied upon in resolving [a] motion [for summary judgment].”18 Second, in contravention of our precedent, the District Court failed to review the documents individually and produce “specific…
…2527 weights of presumption based on the extent to which they were relied upon in resolving [a] motion [for summary judgment].”18 Second, in contravention of our precedent, the District Court failed to review the documents individually and produce “specific…
…and useful in the judicial process in order for it to be designated a judicial document. Id. Brown was building on Amodeo I’s holding when it said, “As our precedent makes clear, a court “‘perform[s] the judicial function’ . …
…25 weights of presumption based on the extent to which they were relied upon in resolving [a] motion [for summary judgment].”18 Second, in contravention of our precedent, the District Court failed to review the documents individually and produce “specific…
…those documents individually for possible unsealing. We agree that no such categorical conclusion was warranted. To the extent that error may be attributable to any lack of clarity in this court’s precedents, see January 2020 Order, 2020 WL 133570…
…indeed, offer any explanation at all) as to why some unspecified interested in publicly revealing documents concerning the sexual assault of minors should take precedence over the well-reasoned Protective Order this Court not only entered but repeatedly reaffirmed. D…
…serve Mr. Epstein by alternate means. Mot. at 2; Doc. # 160.8 Plaintiff apparently now claims that she never received that email from Martin Weinberg. All of the preceding communications, however, indicate that Mr. Weinberg promptly responded to Ms. McCawley…