…to documents that may be released, they should not receive a second opportunity to object thereafter. Allowing Non-Parties multiple opportunities to object to unsealing would set a precedent that would exponentially delay this process. The same is true of…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…was a message from HR indicating that there would be 11 Finally, Defendant also refused to answer foundational questions that are necessary to precede questions authorized by this Court, such as: “In terms of preparing for this deposition…
…was a message from HR indicating that there would be 11 Finally, Defendant also refused to answer foundational questions that are necessary to precede questions authorized by this Court, such as: “In terms of preparing for this deposition…
…Order. Questions concerning 8 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1201-17 Filed 01/27/21 Page 9 of 12 Defendant also refused to answer foundational questions that are necessary precedent to the question authorized by this Court…
…LAP Document 1327-5 Filed 01/05/24 Page 12 of 17 Finally, Defendant also refused to answer foundational questions that are necessary to precede questions authorized by this Court, such as: x “In terms of preparing for this deposition…
…LAP Document 1218-1 Filed 07/15/21 Page 12 of 17 Finally, Defendant also refused to answer foundational questions that are necessary to precede questions authorized by this Court, such as: “In terms of preparing for this deposition…
…confidence in the administration of justice.”). Indeed, the motion to intervene is devoid of any citations to precedent that allows an individual to exploit these bedrock legal principles solely for his personal benefit, rather than the public at large. Furthermore…
…2017, hearing, which preceded this Court’s November 14, 2017, order, this Court and the parties did not address whether the Protective Order would require the return or destruction of the documents before the conclusion of the Second Circuit’s…
…. involving or including massage with individuals Defendant knew to be or believed might become known to Epstein.” Defendant also refused to answer foundational questions that are necessary precedent to the question authorized by this Court. The Court should direct Defendant…
…Court, Paul Cassell has provided an accounting of the “evidence” that he claims supports the truth of Virginia Roberts Giuffre’s accusations against me. It is a woefully inadequate presentation, as the preceding paragraphs demonstrate. The irony, of course, is…