…privacy, and (3) requesting excerpts of sealed materials that mention them for their review (the “September 25 Email”). The parties dispute the procedural import of the September 25 Email under the Protocol governing the unsealing of documents in this action…
…Modify the Protective Order for the reasons set forth below. The Proposed Intervenors are two non-parties, Jeffrey Epstein and Leslie Groff (“Epstein Defendants”). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 18, 2016, this Court entered a Protective Order (DE 62…
…INSTRUCTION Ms. Giuffre hereby files a Renewed Motion to Compel Data from Defendant’s Undisclosed Email Accounts and for an Adverse Inference Jury Instruction, and states as follows. I. SIGNIFICANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY On October 14, 2016, Ms. Giuffre filed a…
…Defendant. West Headnotes (37) Civil Action No. 14–30211–MGM | Signed October 9, 2015 [1] Federal Courts Substance or procedur
…at 1.1 Doe 171’s motion is procedurally and substantively deficient and should be denied outright. While Doe 171 filed her letter as a “motion to seal,” it is instead clearly a motion for reconsideration governed by Local Civil…
…his case and in Maxwell allowing him access to all discovery materials and pleadings in Maxwell. Of course, if the Court prefers a different procedural route to accomplish what he requests, then Professor Dershowitz will follow the Court’s directive. …
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…for various reasons, most of which will be apparent, e.g., the protocol did not address various substantive and procedural issues, it did not account for the Court’s rulings and comments at the January 16 status conference, and, in…
…Decl. Ex. B. The parties have been unable to reach a resolution without the need for Court intervention. I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 12, 2016 Ms. Maxwell served her First Set of Discovery Requests on Plaintiff. Request Number 19…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…was filed. Defendant, wanting the Court to ignore her further misconduct, again, wrongly moves to strike. 1. The Motion to Strike Should be Denied As Improper The instant motion is procedurally improper, as Rule 12(f), Fed. R. Civ. P…
…entitled to present those changed circumstances - to the Court. In an effort to deflect attention from the merits of attorney-client issues, Defendant raises the procedural argument that somehow Ms. Giuffre has failed to provide an appropriate certificate of conferral…
…in a private suit, the proper procedure is to seek permissive intervention under 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1118 Filed 09/16/20 Page 4 of 21 Rule 24(b).” Daniels v. City of New York…
…interests). B. Federal Law Rather than New York Law Controls the Evidentiary Issue of Whether Can Be Called as Witnesses. 9 “[F]ederal courts sitting in diversity apply state substantive law and federal procedural law.” U.S.…
…7433 (LAP) VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, v. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. / NOTICE OF REDACTION REQUEST – TRANSCRIPT In accordance with this Court’s forms and procedures, undersigned counsel acknowledges that redactions o…
…07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ______________________________/ NON-REDACTED DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. McCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO EXCEED PRESUMPTIVE TEN DEPOSITION LIMIT IN FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE 30(A)(2)(a)(ii), FILED UNDER SEAL I…
…Preska, for an order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 granting the USVI’s motion to intervene and for confidential access to judicial records and discovery documents. The grounds for this motion are set forth in the accompanying…
…24 Page 2 of 7 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell (“Ms. Maxwell”), pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 53, files this Motion to Appoint a Special Master to Preside over the Third Deposition of Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, and states as follows: …
Comments