gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1328.41.pdf PDF
…Document 1328-41 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................…
…Document 1328-41 Filed 01/05/24 Page 2 of 31 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ........................................................................…
…11 Defendant Ghislaine Maxwell, through counsel, submits this Response to plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel All Work Product and Attorney Client [sic] Communications with Philip Barden” (Doc.637). PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND On February 24, 2016, we served on plaintiff’s counsel…
…10th Floor New York, New York 10020 (212) 763-5000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES .............…
…Modify the Protective Order for the reasons set forth below. The Proposed Intervenors are two non-parties, Jeffrey Epstein and Leslie Groff (“Epstein Defendants”). PRELIMINARY STATEMENT PROCEDURAL HISTORY On March 18, 2016, this Court entered a Protective Order (DE 62…
…5000 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...................................................................................................... iii-v PRELIMINA…
…of 32 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ...................................................................................................... iii-v PRELI…
…INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1 I. PRELIMINARY STATEMENT ..................................................................................... 1 II. CERTIFICATE OF CONFERRAL .................................................................…
…Ghislaine Maxwell, through counsel, submits this Surreply in opposition to plaintiff’s “Motion to Compel All Work Product and Attorney Client [sic] Communications with Philip Barden” (Doc.637). INTRODUCTION Procedurally, plaintiff’s Motion to Compel is a mess. The motion…
…his case and in Maxwell allowing him access to all discovery materials and pleadings in Maxwell. Of course, if the Court prefers a different procedural route to accomplish what he requests, then Professor Dershowitz will follow the Court’s directive. …
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…after January 1, 2007, is permitted and is governed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 32.1 and this Court’s Local Rule 32.1.1. When citing a summary order in a document filed with this Court, a party…
…orders. We ask that the Court immediately convene a conference with counsel for all parties to discuss how to address this grave matter, given the procedural posture of this case and the ongoing harm being inflicted upon Mr. Dershowitz. Background…
…her That she relied on the Protective Order in answering questions, or refusing to answer questions, is obvious from the procedural posture of the case: • March 2, 2016 (DE 38): Defendant moved for a Protective Order, citing Plaintiff’s anticipated…
…entitled to present those changed circumstances - to the Court. In an effort to deflect attention from the merits of attorney-client issues, Defendant raises the procedural argument that somehow Ms. Giuffre has failed to provide an appropriate certificate of conferral…
…have moved pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 to intervene in this defamation action brought by plaintiff Virginia Giuffre ("Giuffre" or the "Plaintiff") against defendant Ghislaine Maxwell ("Maxwell" or the "Defendant") and to unseal all of the documents…
…look foolish on videotape for not remembering the contents of documents that relate back to witnesses and events occurring more than 17 years ago. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are designed to preclude such litigation by ambush and surprise…
…In 2011, Jack Scarola, representing Brad Edwards in the Epstein v. Edwards case, faced procedural impediments to obtaining a sworn deposition from a member of the British Royal family. Accordingly, he publicly invited the voluntary testimony of Prince Andrew, explaining…
…the request on October 27, 2015 and has therefore had an additional month and a half to digest the requests than is usually permitted by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.” See Order re Motion to Stay Discovery, D.E…
…cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSES AND OBJECTIONS TO DEFENDANT’S SECOND REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION AND DEFENDANT’S INTERROGATORIES, PLAINTIFF’S ANSWERS TO DEFENDANT’S REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26…