…Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order…
…Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order…
…Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order…
…Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order…
…resisted the appellants’ and plaintiff Virginia Giuffre’s efforts to unseal and release to the public materials and information we believe properly were sealed. Since the mandate has not issued and jurisdiction has not been returned to the district court…
…The task can only be properly accomplished with a thorough line-by-line review of each of the redactions contained within the briefing papers and briefing-related papers. It likewise is a substantial undertaking to identify even in summary fashion…
…LAP Document 1226 Filed 08/04/21 Page 2 of 4 August 4, 2021 Page 2 of 4 The second issue arises from the parties’ failure to properly make redactions …
…D.N.Y. 2009)(emphasis added). Interveners therefore respectfully request that the List of Decided Motions be filed publicly. It is unclear to Intervenors what information in the title of any decided motions could be properly sealed. However, if such…
…referenced in the Order, and the exhibits are not properly considered judicial documents. 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1150-1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 4 of 28 Defendant’s Position on Docket Entries 231, 279…
…Decided Motions The Court previously ruled that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order…
…com Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1278 Filed 11/30/22 Page 3 of 4 696 (S.D.N.Y. 2011) (reflecting that a motion for reconsideration is “properly granted” upon a showing of “a need to . …
…at any trial.” (DE 311 at 17 n.7). The necessary “participation” of Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 in this case can be satisfied by offering their properly supported—and relevant, admissible, and non-cumulative—testimony as needed…
…referenced in the Order, and the exhibits are not properly considered judicial documents. 2 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1150-1 Filed 11/12/20 Page 4 of 28 Defendant’s Position on Docket Entries 231, 279…
…documents, all argue that the District Court failed to analyze the documents individually or properly apply the presumption of public access to court documents. We therefore ordered that the appeals be heard in tandem and held argument on March 6…
…at any trial.” (DE 311 at 17 n.7). The necessary “participation” of Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 in this case can be satisfied by offering their properly supported—and relevant, admissible, and non-cumulative—testimony as needed…
…stating that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to [his] decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Plaintiff is wrong. The Court made it clear…
…documents, all argue that the District Court failed to analyze the documents individually or properly apply the presumption of public access to court documents. We therefore ordered that the appeals be heard in tandem and held argument on March 6…
…documents, all argue that the District Court failed to analyze the documents individually or properly apply the presumption of public access to court documents. We therefore ordered that the appeals be heard in tandem and held argument on March 6…
…. . in this case can be satisfied by offering . . . properly supported – and relevant, admissible, and non-cumulative – testimony as needed, whether through testimony at trial . . . or affidavits supported in support [of] the relevancy of discovery requests.” DE 324 at 8 (emphasis…
…the case, including sex trafficking allegations involving Mr. Epstein, Ms. Brown and the Miami Herald are properly entitled to intervene as he did. They, as with the rest of the public, have a right of access to the judicial documents…
Comments