gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.263.0.pdf PDF
…14 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT …
…14 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT …
…of this Court or any Orders of the Court. 3. Ms. Maxwell objects to the Interrogatories to the extent they seek information protected by the attorney/client privilege, the work-product doctrine, Rule 408 of the Federal Rules of Evidence…
…any details about her ordeals two decades ago, she unquestionably continues to experience trauma similar to that of at least one other Non-Party Doe whose privacy and identity this Court protected with Plaintiff Virginia Guiffre’s consent. See Doc…
…any details about her ordeals two decades ago, she unquestionably continues to experience trauma similar to that of at least one other Non-Party Doe whose privacy and identity this Court protected with Plaintiff Virginia Guiffre’s consent. See Doc…
…15 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PRELIMINARY STATEMENT .................................................................................................... 1 ARGUMENT…
…addressee only. It contains information, which may be confidential and legally privileged and also protected by copyright. Unless you are the named addressee (or authorised to receive for the addressee) you may not copy or use it, or disclose it…
…one of the largest and 17 most significant pieces to us are the assertions by plaintiff 18 that her own communications with law enforcement are somehow 19 protected by -- 20 THE COURT: I'm prepared to deal with that. 21 …
…There, the court recognized that a non-party’s privacy interest should be protected “if this can be done in a manner consistent with the public’s reasonable interest in access to evidence relating to Plaintiffs’ equal protection claim.” Id…
…4 So we are awaiting a ruling. We believe those 5 individuals should be protected under the Court's protective 6 order and those names kept confidential during the course of 7 this, and it is my understanding that defendants…
…attention from her own conduct. Defendant’s main argument is that discovery should be stayed because Defendant will be successful on her Motion to Dismiss as her defamatory statements are protected by certain qualified privileges. The case law is clear…
…one of the largest and 17 most significant pieces to us are the assertions by plaintiff 18 that her own communications with law enforcement are somehow 19 protected by -- 20 THE COURT: I'm prepared to deal with that. 21…
… The Court of Appeals’ Stated Concern For The Publication Of Libelous Statements Protected By The Litigation Privilege Emphasizes This Court’s Responsibility To Protect The Interests Of Non-Parties. While the Court of Appeals ultimately found Judge Sweet erred in…
…one of the largest and 17 most significant pieces to us are the assertions by plaintiff 18 that her own communications with law enforcement are somehow 19 protected by -- 20 THE COURT: I'm prepared to deal with that. 21…
…one of the largest and 17 most significant pieces to us are the assertions by plaintiff 18 that her own communications with law enforcement are somehow 19 protected by -- 20 THE COURT: I'm prepared to deal with that. 21 …
…rendition of legal services by Edwards and Cassell. As long as the Jane Doe #3 has a reasonable expectation of privacy in the communication, under§ 90.507, the privilege is protected. Mcwatters v. Stale, 36 So.3d 613, 636 (Fla…
…s Office. The Office had years earlier (in 2008) identified Ms. Giuffre as a protected “victim” of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex abuse, even mailing to Ms. Giuffre a notice of her rights as a crime victim under the CVRA. See…
…This is the statement 22 that we want you to send out there on behalf of Epstein, if 23 some interest of Epstein was being protected, but there's not. 24 There's no nexus between those two things. 25…
…him. Instead, Ms. McCawley’s very limited role was simply to insure that Ms. Giuffre’s interests were protected. For example, Ms. McCawley objected when Dershowitz improperly disclosed confidential settlement discussions he had with David Boies, one of Ms. Giuffre…
…brought into existence for several reasons or purposes only one of which is to obtain professional legal advice in litigation that is pending or anticipated, is it protected by legal professional privilege from dis- G covery? What is the test…
Comments