…AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND..............................................…
…AUTHORITIES .......................................................................................................... ii I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 1 II. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND..............................................…
…in response to Interrogatory 4 requesting information regarding contact 4 In her Supplemental Responses, Plaintiff retracted her previous reliance on the “investigative privilege” (which does not exist), “accountant-client” privilege (not recognized in New York) and “spousal privilege” (in no…
…of New York Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ______________________________/ PLAINTIFF VIRGINIA GIUFFRE’S REDACTED REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR FORENSIC EXAMINATION …
…Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ PLAINTIFF’S REDACTED RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL NON-PRIVILEGED DOCUMENTS BOIES, SCHILL…
…York Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ PLAINTIFF’S REDACTED MOTION TO COMPEL DEFENDANT TO ANSWER DEPOSITION QUESTIONS FILED UNDER SEAL1 Plaintiff Virginia Giuf…
…L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ PLAINTIFF, VIRGINIA GIUFFRE’S REDACTED BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE PRIVILEGE CLAIMED FOR HER IN CAMERA SUBMISSION Plaintiff Virginia L. Giuffre, by…
…New York Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ______________________________/ REDACTED DECLARATION OF SIGRID S. McCAWLEY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF VIRGINIA GIUFFRE’S REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR …
…United States District Court Southern District of New York Virginia L. Giuffre, Plaintiff, Case No.: 15-cv-07433-RWS v. Ghislaine Maxwell, Defendant. ________________________________/ THE PARTIES’ AGREED NOTICE OF FILING REDACTED OPINION …
…33.3. Defendant has served interrogatories that are in direct violation of that Rule because the interrogatories are not “restricted to those seeking names of witnesses with knowledge of information relevant to the subject matter of the action, the computation…
…33.3. Defendant has served interrogatories that are in direct violation of that Rule because the interrogatories are not “restricted to those seeking names of witnesses with knowledge of information relevant to the subject matter of the action, the computation…
…Protocol: First, to speed up the unsealing process and to minimize the number of Non-Party names that need to be redacted from future materials that are unsealed, the parties will send the Non-Party Notice to all remaining Non…
…33.3. Defendant has served interrogatories that are in direct violation of that Rule because the interrogatories are not “restricted to those seeking names of witnesses with knowledge of information relevant to the subject matter of the action, the computation…
…Disclose All Individuals To Whom Defendant Has Disseminated (sic) Confidential Information (Doc. #388), and states as follows: INTRODUCTION Plaintiff’s Reply makes material misrepresentations of fact. Those misstatements cannot stand in a filed, albeit redacted, pleading. Ms. Maxwell …
…33.3. Defendant has served interrogatories that are in direct violation of that Rule because the interrogatories are not “restricted to those seeking names of witnesses with knowledge of information relevant to the subject matter of the action, the computation…
…1167-2), as attachments hereto. Material subject to this Court’s January 26, 2021, order remains redacted. ECF No. 1193. Sincerely, /s/ Sigrid McCawley Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq. cc: Counsel of Record …
…33.3. Defendant has served interrogatories that are in direct violation of that Rule because the interrogatories are not “restricted to those seeking names of witnesses with knowledge of information relevant to the subject matter of the action, the computation…
…33.3. Defendant has served interrogatories that are in direct violation of that Rule because the interrogatories are not “restricted to those seeking names of witnesses with knowledge of information relevant to the subject matter of the action, the computation…
…this Court Ordered Defendant to sit for a second deposition because her refusal to answer questions posed in her first Deposition (June 20, 2016 Sealed Order, filed in redacted version at D.E. 264-1). Yet, during her second deposition…
…Colorado ....................................................................................................... 4 B. No State Statute Forbids Disclosure of the Documents ....................................................... 6 C. All Documents Were Redacted Appropriately By the Law Enforcement Agencies ........... 8 II.…
Comments