…recently retained undersigned counsel in the United States to file a narrow appeal in opposition to the release of certain sealed materials containing information that has not previously been disclosed and is likely to cause her to suffer irreparable harm…
…Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016). Such materials are referred to herein as the “Sealed Materials” or “Sealed Items.” The Sealed Materials will be enumerated in a List of Decided Motions designated by the Court . In accordance with Brown v. Maxwell…
…and January 26, 2021 (ECF No. 1193), Plaintiff files the documents ordered unsealed listed in Exhibit F to Defendant’s Reply Memorandum of Law in Further Support of Objections to Unsealing Sealed Materials Related to Docket Entries 231, 279, 315…
…concerning the Court’s August 26 and 27, 2020, orders regarding the next steps in the Court’s individualized review of the sealed materials, and deadlines set forth in the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (the “Protocol”). Dkts…
…See Def. Letter at 2.) The Court of Appeals’ Mandate and the terms of the Protocol support Defendant’s interpretation. The Court of Appeals instructed the Court to undertake a “particularized review” of the sealed materials (Mandate, dated Aug. 9…
…this case of significant public interest is wholly unwarranted, and her positions demonstrate her interest in continues to hide from public scrutiny that which has already been sealed for far too long. She further fundamentally mischaracterizes the role of the…
…for clarification, which requested that the Court clarify that the deposition would be limited to non-duplicative questioning “limited to the four areas of inquiry referred to in the Order at page 7.” Sealed Order of March 23, 2017 at…
…this is entirely unworkable.1 Second, the Court adheres to its planned order, see supra at 1, and approves as appropriate Ms. Giuffre’s proposed redactions to the sealed materials. The Court does so, however, subject to several caveats. Ms…
…individual Doe, enumerated the relevant docket entries in which that Doe is mentioned, and stated the Court’s reasoning for whether to unseal or keep sealed that specific Doe’s identity. Where the Court stated its holding of, for example…
…redacted Decided Motions List. First, Ms. Maxwell proposes that the Court proceed in chronological order and consider the first five motions (together with any related, sealed documents) that mention J. Does 1 & 2. Those five motions are DEs 143, 164…
…broad array of generalized countervailing interests. Third, Maxwell proposed that any brief arguing for unsealing by an Original Party should include a sealed set of proposed redactions of the documents to be unsealed. Plaintiff does not consent to this requirement…
…judicial documents. To the extent the district court concluded otherwise, we vacate its denials of unsealing and remand for further individual review of sealed documents and unsealing as warranted consistent with this opinion. In all other respects, however, we affirm…