…Finally, the materials at issue should not be released publicly because the criminal court overseeing Ms. Maxwell’s criminal prosecution has not yet had an opportunity to determine whether the evidence will be admissible at trial or suppressed. I. As…
…x MEMORANDUM OF GHISLAINE MAXWELL IN SUPPORT OF HER MOTION UNDER THE FOURTH AMENDMENT, MARTINDELL, AND THE FIFTH AMENDMENT TO SUPPRESS ALL EVIDENCE OBTAINED FROM THE GOVERNMENT’S SUBPOENA TO AND TO DISMISS COUNTS FIVE AND SIX …
…Maxwell. The arguments should not be re-litigated. Maxwell argues that “[t]he Sealed Items contain information relevant to the Criminal Action that may or may not later be determined inadmissible in that trial,” and that “[u]nless suppressed, the…
…that release will taint a jury pool: She also asks this Court to withhold judicial documents to help her win her criminal case. See Objections, at 10 (“Unless suppressed, the deposition transcript will most certainly be a trial exhibit.”); id…
…United States v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330, DE 17, pp 16–17. Unless that testimony is suppressed, the deposition transcript will be an exhibit in the criminal case. But if the testimony is released, Ms. Maxwell’s ability to seek…
…on the protective order. See Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 126. Third, Ms. Maxwell unabashedly seeks to “suppress” evidence of potential perjury that could be used against her in a criminal trial. Dkt. 1191, at 2. A court may weigh…
…criminal trial, as she has already (see Memorandum of Ghislaine Maxwell in Support of Her Motion Under the Due Process Clause to Suppress Evidence Obtained from the Government’s Subpoena to [Redacted] and to Dismiss Counts Five and Six, dated…
…2014), Judge Weinstein denied the media’s motion to unseal papers filed in connection with an unsuccessful defense motion to suppress evidence obtained by electronic surveillance. He found that “defendants’ interest in a fair trial and the interests of third…
Comments