…Finally, the materials at issue should not be released publicly because the criminal court overseeing Ms. Maxwell’s criminal prosecution has not yet had an opportunity to determine whether the evidence will be admissible at trial or suppressed. I. As…
…Maxwell. The arguments should not be re-litigated. Maxwell argues that “[t]he Sealed Items contain information relevant to the Criminal Action that may or may not later be determined inadmissible in that trial,” and that “[u]nless suppressed, the…
…that release will taint a jury pool: She also asks this Court to withhold judicial documents to help her win her criminal case. See Objections, at 10 (“Unless suppressed, the deposition transcript will most certainly be a trial exhibit.”); id…
…United States v. Maxwell, 20-cr-330, DE 17, pp 16–17. Unless that testimony is suppressed, the deposition transcript will be an exhibit in the criminal case. But if the testimony is released, Ms. Maxwell’s ability to seek…
…on the protective order. See Lugosch, 435 F.3d at 126. Third, Ms. Maxwell unabashedly seeks to “suppress” evidence of potential perjury that could be used against her in a criminal trial. Dkt. 1191, at 2. A court may weigh…
…supra, 464 U.S. at 510)). Ms. Maxwell’s arguments next. According to the Herald, Ms. Maxwell seeks to “suppress” evidence of perjury. Dkt. 1195 at 2. Not so. Ms. Maxwell did not lie during her depositions, and the government…
Comments