…1), as attachments hereto. Plaintiff will file “the transcript of Doe 1’s deposition and materials quoting that transcript or disclosing information from that transcript” on a timeline consistent with that set forth in the Court’s October 21, 2020…
…2 (“forced to personally serve the Defendant’s former boyfriend, employer, and co-conspirator”). As the timeline and documents now reveal, however, Plaintiff failed to provide notice to Ms. Maxwell that she was attempting to serve a Rule 45 subpoena…
…15 trial after we argue about all of this. 16 But I think it's important for the Court to understand 17 and put into context first what I will call the Alfredo 18 Rodriguez timeline. 19 By the way…
…2 (“forced to personally serve the Defendant’s former boyfriend, employer, and co-conspirator”). As the timeline and documents now reveal, however, Plaintiff failed to provide notice to Ms. Maxwell that she was attempting to serve a Rule 45 subpoena…
…or sent from that account. 7 That's every single personal email. This is without 8 limitations, without exceptions, without a timeline. And 9 pursuant to these subpoenas, these emails are to be turned over 10 to defense counsel. So…
…regarding ” and “invent stories regarding Alan Dershowitz.” Response at 4, 6. But the emails she cites and the overall timeline show nothing of the sort. For example, Churcher working with Plaintiff to piece together evidence she could use to back…
…2 (“forced to personally serve the Defendant’s former boyfriend, employer, and co-conspirator”). As the timeline and documents now reveal, however, Plaintiff failed to provide notice to Ms. Maxwell that she was attempting to serve a Rule 45 subpoena…
…2 (“forced to personally serve the Defendant’s former boyfriend, employer, and co-conspirator”). As the timeline and documents now reveal, however, Plaintiff failed to provide notice to Ms. Maxwell that she was attempting to serve a Rule 45 subpoena…
…eye. 28 The Court should not even reach the substance of Dershowitz’s motion, as he has failed to meet the requirements for permissive intervention, which, as Dershowitz admits, include timeliness. MasterCard Intern. Inc. v. Visa Intern. Service Ass'n…
…MR. PAGLIUCA: Briefly, your Honor. 11 First with regard to this timeliness issue, the case 12 that they cite has nothing to do with this issue that is before 13 the Court. 14 Just in terms of the discovery process…
…eye. 28 The Court should not even reach the substance of Dershowitz’s motion, as he has failed to meet the requirements for permissive intervention, which, as Dershowitz admits, include timeliness. MasterCard Intern. Inc. v. Visa Intern. Service Ass'n…
Comments