…a central proposition underlying Exemp- tion 8 -- that certain information must be Florida Circuit Court kept from the public for fear that it will be Duval County misunderstood and lead to overreaction — is somewhat inconsistent with the phi- GUY R…
…16, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Jeffrey M Matusow < > wrote: Jeffrey, I think the selloff on the Goldman news is an over-reaction. Your Eurodollars position has moved 3-4bps and you have a profit of $340k. I…
…stay discovery. In the factual background section, I review many of the requests, in an attempt to demonstrate how petitioners are overreaching into irrelevant areas. I don't believe the stay motion needs to be filed under seal, unless expressing…
…A scheme to defraud is a plan to deprive a person of something of value by trick, deceit, chicane or overreaching. To make out such a scheme, a plaintiff must provide proof of a material misrepresentation. Criminal Law & Procedure >…
…657 (2d Cir. 2016). A "scheme to defraud" is "a plan to deprive a person of something of value by trick, deceit, chicane or overreaching." Autuori, 212 F.3d at 115 (citing McNally v. United States, 483 U.S. 350…
…future? In addition, by virtue of this overreaching and silly definition, Boris has an obligation to return or destroy property or information that Boris might receive from some now unnamed person or entity without any current relationship to Bill, but…
…future? In addition, by virtue of this overreaching and silly definition, Boris has an obligation to return or destroy property or information that Boris might receive from some now unnamed person or entity without any current relationship to Bill, but…
…future? In addition, by virtue of this overreaching and silly definition, Boris has an obligation to return or destroy property or information that Boris might receive from some now unnamed person or entity without any current relationship to Bill, but…
…It would appear that Plaintiff intends to generate, and then use, unsupported media speculation to (a) support her overreaching discovery requests, and (b) taint the jury pool in this jurisdiction. In sum, given the media attention focused on this case…
…N.Y. 1985) (noting that discovery requests were not served on the moving party, the moving party did not argue that document requests were burdensome or overreaching, and the party to which the discovery requests were served did not object);…
Comments