…10y constant maturity swap > 3% at expiry explained below. Transaction rationale: • Many investors have benefited of the secular bull market for bonds started in 1981 to construct US equity/bond portfolio allocations that have yielded high risk adjusted returns…
…reasons. Generally, in a suit to enforce a restrictive covenant, the party seeking enforcement must demonstrate that t=e covenant was made to for its benefit. Here, Kevin would likely argue that t=e only benefited properties with respect to the restrictive…
…at ¶¶ 2-3. Parcel II, which is located on St. Thomas itself, is subject to a restrictive covenant that benefits the owner of Great St. James. The covenant provides that Parcel 11 shall be used exclusively for a dock, wharf…
…reasons. Instead, the Parties benefited from a presumption of closure. Of particular importance, a main reason denying the prior motions to unseal — the on-going status of the litigation — is no longer relevant because the litigation has been settled. While…
…shed light on the timing of the filing of the CVRA action, the lack of prosecution of the case, how the NPA actually benefited M. up to the point she settled her case with Epstein, her discussions with third parties…
…to Am., Ex. C.) Plaintiffs cannot rightfully have benefited from their own reliance on the correction and then assert they should also be shielded from what it says. Accordingly, while Plaintiffs did not attach the correction to the SAC following…
…historical deed restriction therefore it does not have standing to enforce the alleged restrictive covenant The alleged restrictive covenant relied upon in the FAC states on its face that it is for the benefit ofTrack I and track 2 owners…
…the 23 statute as it read at the time permitted a cause of action 24 against the perpetrator, not against someone who was alleged to 25 have been a person who benefited from a venture, which is SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS…
…reasons. Instead, the Parties benefited from a presumption of closure. Of particular importance, a main reason denying the prior motions to unseal – the on-going status of the litigation – is no longer relevant because the litigation has been settled. While…
…reasons. Instead, the Parties benefited from a presumption of closure. Of particular importance, a main reason denying the prior motions to unseal – the on-going status of the litigation – is no longer relevant because the litigation has been settled. While…
…not adversely affect the remaining duration or the extent of the incentives available to Mobileye and its subsidiaries resulting from the status of a "Preferred Enterprise" and/or "Benefifted Enterprise" under Israel's Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investment…
…not adversely affect the remaining duration or the extent of the incentives available to Mobileye and its subsidiaries resulting from the status of a "Preferred Enterprise" and/or "Benefifted Enterprise" under Israel's Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investment…
…the Justice Department received information that, after leavin his employment at the U.S. Attorneys Office for the Southern District of Florida, benefitted financially or otherwise from a connection to Jeffrey Epstein 7. The U.S. Attorneys' Office for the…
…the office and look for money -he was not so terrible then- they were all so friendly. Everyone is making them out to be so bad-so many people benefitted from their generosity and kindness. They were wonderful to me…
…Overweight We are initiating coverage of iPayment with an Overweight rating. The company is a leading merchant acquirer serving small businesses and has benefitted from increasing electronic payments by consumers. iPayment has generated higher margins given the challenging nature of…
…not adversely affect the remaining duration or the extent of the incentives available to Mobileye and its subsidiaries resulting from the status of a "Preferred Enterprise" and/or "Benefifted Enterprise" under Israel's Law for the Encouragement of Capital Investment…
… minor issues do not establish that counsel performed in a deficient manner. The record indicates that the movant benefitted tremendously from decisions that he and defense counsel made. Nothing the movant states in support of his request for relief leads…
…his principal's interests and is acting entirely for his own or another's purposes. However, this limited exception to imputation does not apply where there is a benefit to both the agent and the corporation. Kirschner v. KPMG LLP…
…2-3. Parcel II, which is located on St. Thomas itself, is subject to a restrictive covenant that benefits the owner of Great St. James. The covenant provides that Parcel 11 shall be used exclusively for a dock, wharf, or…
permitted under the terms of such applicable benefit plans. to the same extent as such Continuing Employees were entitled to credit for such service under any similar benefit plan in which the Continuing Employees participated or were eligible to participate…