…282 (E.D. Va. 2012) ............................................ 6 Fox Industries, Inc. v. Gurovich, No. 03–CV–5166, 2006 WL 2882580, *11 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2006) ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Grochowski v. Ph…
…history.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006). Indeed, as has been reiterated throughout this unsealing process, there is a presumption of public access to judicial documents. United States v. Amodeo, 44 F…
…S.D.N.Y. 2009) ............................................................................ 4, 7, 10, 13 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................... 3, 4 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011…
…or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” United States v. Thorn, 446 F.3d 378, 383 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotations omitted), quoted in United States v. Barnett, Nos. 90-cr-913 & 19-cv-132…
…Motorola, Inc., 165 F. App’x 878 (2d Cir. 2005) ............................................................................................6 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................... 2, 6 Lytle v. JPMorgan Cha…
…282 (E.D. Va. 2012) ............................................ 6 Fox Industries, Inc. v. Gurovich, No. 03–CV–5166, 2006 WL 2882580, *11 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2006) ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Grochowski v. Ph…
…Inc. v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829 (1978) ................................................................................................................... 3 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) .................................................................................................. 2, 4 Lytle …
…Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 126 (2d Cir. 2006). And when a protective order contemplates modification or disclosure, parties should expect that information deemed CONFIDENTIAL may not remain so. Id. The protective order in this case explicitly…
…Supp. 2d 318 (S.D.N.Y. 2003) ................................................................................................ 8, 9 In re Omnicom Grp., No. 02 Civ. 4483 RCC/MHD 2006 WL 3016311 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2006) ......................................... 6 In re Pineapple Antitrust Litig., No. 04 MD. 1628…
…Kolko, 242 F.R.D. 193, 195 (E.D.N.Y. 2006). Here, the confidentiality designations concern not parties to the litigation, but mere witnesses. The “public generally has a strong interest in protecting the identities of sexual assault victims…
…282 (E.D. Va. 2012) ............................................ 6 Fox Industries, Inc. v. Gurovich, No. 03–CV–5166, 2006 WL 2882580, *11 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 6, 2006) ......................................................................................................................................... 19 Grochowski v. Ph…
…4888534 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 12, 2012) ............................................. 12 Schiller v. City of New York, No. 04 Civ. 7921, 2006 WL 2788256 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 27, 2006) .................................... 3, 5, 15 Thevenine v. City of Troy, No. 16 Civ…
…Sept. 2, 2014) ........................................ 12 Allen v. City of New York, 420 F. Supp. 2d 295 (S.D.N.Y. 2006) .................................................................................................. 15 Bernstein v. Bernstein Litowitz Berger & Grossmann LLP, 814 F.3d 132 (2d Cir. 2016) ...................…
…Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). Under this presumption, access to trial proceedings may be denied only “if specific, on the record findings are made demonstrating that closure is essential to preserve higher…
…435 F.3d 110, 122 (2d Cir. 2006) (noting that the filing party should, for purposes of public access, “be assumed to have supported their papers with admissible evidence”). “If the rationale behind access is to allow the public an…
…452332 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 8, 1997) .......................................8 Kunstler v. City of New York, No. 04CIV1145(RWS)(MHD), 2006 WL 2516625 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 29, 2006) ......................8, 9 Labarbera v. Ulster Cty. Soc'y for Prevention of…
…D.N.Y. Sept. 2, 2014) ........................................ 4 Allen v. City of N.Y., 420 F. Supp. 2d 295 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)................................................................................. 7 Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., 805 F.2d 1 (1st Cir. 1986) ...........................................................…
…of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006)). Merely filing a document with a court “‘is insufficient to render that paper a judicial document subject to the right of public access.’” Trump, 940 F.3d at 150 (quoting…
…We have the Palm Beach police 6 report, which shows over 30 minors who reported during that 7 time period, to up until now 2006, being abused in that 8 circumstance in Palm Beach. Then we have the arrest that…
…App . 2006) ("for waiver to occur under the at issue doctrine , the proponent of a privilege must make a claim or raise a defense based upon the privileged matter and the proponent must necessarily use the privileged information in order…