…1984) ............................................................................................... 11 In re Omnicom Grp., Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 02 CIV. 4483 RCC/MHD, 2006 WL 3016311 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2006) .......................... 5 In re Parmalat Sec. Litig., 258 F.R.D. 236 (S.D.N.Y…
…Motorola, Inc., 165 F. App’x 878 (2d Cir. 2005) ............................................................................................6 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................... 2, 6 Lytle v. JPMorgan Cha…
…Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 126 (2d Cir. 2006). And when a protective order contemplates modification or disclosure, parties should expect that information deemed CONFIDENTIAL may not remain so. Id. The protective order in this case explicitly…
…F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006). The presumption for documents such as those at issue here may be overcome only by a “specific and substantial” showing that the presumption is outweighed by a recognized and substantial countervailing interest. Id.…
…In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 454 F.Supp.2d 220, 223 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (“document-by-document confidentiality determinations . . . would impose an enormous burden upon the Court and severely hinder its progress toward resolution of…
…No. 06 Civ. 322 (LTS) (AJ), 2006 WL 1330064, at *1 n.2 (S.D.N.Y. May 16, 2006) (noting state court records sealed to protect privacy of sexual assault victim pursuant to Section 50-b of the N…
…In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 454 F.Supp.2d 220, 223 (S.D.N.Y.2006) (“document-by-document confidentiality determinations . . . would impose an enormous burden upon the Court and severely hinder its progress toward resolution of…
…119–20 (2d Cir. 2006) (discussing same three-step analysis). Giuffre and the Herald argue that the district court erred as a matter of law at the first step when, in its December 2019 and January 2020 Orders, the court…
…My Other Bag, Inc., 156 F.Supp.3d 425 (S.D.N.Y. 2016) ........................................................................................ 10 iii Lugosch v. Pyramid Co., 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006)...........................................................…
…by its very terms, may be modified or contemplates disclosure. Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 126 (2d Cir. 2006); Allen v. City of New York, 420 F. Supp. 2d 295, 301 (S.D.N.Y…
…In Schiller v . City of N .Y., No. 04 CIV . 7921(KMK), 2006 WL 2788256 (S.D .N.Y. Sept. 27 , 2006) , the motion was brought by the New York Times and the Court granted the motion while noting that…
Comments