gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.683.0.pdf PDF
…TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Arlio v. Lively, 474 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 2007).......................................................................................................... 3 Carofino v. Forester, …
…TABLE OF AUTHORITIES Page Cases Arlio v. Lively, 474 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 2007).......................................................................................................... 3 Carofino v. Forester, …
…Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 747 Filed 03/17/17 Page 4 of 27 United States v. Gotti, 457 F. Supp. 2d 395 (S.D.N.Y. 2006)................................................................................... 6, 11 Vackar v. Package Machinery Co., 841 F. Supp…
…1988) ............................................................................................................... 10 In re Omnicom Grp., Inc. Sec. Litig., No. 02 CIV. 4483 RCC/MHD, 2006 WL 3016311 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 23, 2006) ....................... 18 In re Parmalat Sec. Litig., 258 F.R.D. 236 (S.D.N.Y…
…Co. v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 3:06-CV-232 (CFD), 2006 WL 1525970 (D. Conn. May 25, 2006) ..................................9 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997).......................................................................................................8 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 404…
…Co. of N. Am., No. 3:06-CV- 232 (CFD), 2006 WL 1525970, at *2 (D. Conn. May 25, 2006). This guideline makes sense because a “moving party must not only justify those depositions it wishes to take, but also…
…Co. v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 3:06-CV-232 (CFD), 2006 WL 1525970 (D. Conn. May 25, 2006) ..................................9 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997).......................................................................................................8 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 404…
…435 F.3d 110, 123 (2d Cir. 2006) (holding that documents submitted with a motion are “unquestionably judicial documents” “by virtue of having been submitted to the court”). For the following reasons, the Court should hold that materials submitted in…
…history.” Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119 (2d Cir. 2006). Indeed, as has been reiterated throughout this unsealing process, there is a presumption of public access to judicial documents. United States v. Amodeo, 44 F…
…S.D.N.Y. 2009) ............................................................................ 4, 7, 10, 13 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................... 3, 4 Lytle v. JPMorgan Chase, 810 F. Supp. 2d 616 (S.D.N.Y. 2011…
…or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” United States v. Thorn, 446 F.3d 378, 383 (2d Cir. 2006) (internal quotations omitted), quoted in United States v. Barnett, Nos. 90-cr-913 & 19-cv-132…
… 8 A. Correct. 9 Q. And are you aware as to whether or not 10 that list was supplemented after July 25th, 2006, in 11 the investigative incident report? 12 A. I'm not sure if it was updated or…
…Motorola, Inc., 165 F. App’x 878 (2d Cir. 2005) ............................................................................................6 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) ............................................................................................... 2, 6 Lytle v. JPMorgan Cha…
…Inc. v. Virginia, 435 U.S. 829 (1978) ................................................................................................................... 3 Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 2006) .................................................................................................. 2, 4 Lytle …
…Co. v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 3:06-CV-232 (CFD), 2006 WL 1525970 (D. Conn. May 25, 2006) ..................................9 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997).......................................................................................................8 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 404…
…Co. v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 3:06-CV-232 (CFD), 2006 WL 1525970 (D. Conn. May 25, 2006) ..................................9 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997).......................................................................................................8 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 404…
…Co. v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 3:06-CV-232 (CFD), 2006 WL 1525970 (D. Conn. May 25, 2006) ..................................9 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997).......................................................................................................8 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 404…
…435 F.3d 110, 121 (2d Cir. 2006) (“While the defendants are correct that the underlying summary judgment motion in Joy v. North had already been decided when the motion for access to the documents was made, nothing about that…
…Metro N. Commuter R.R. Co., 882 F.2d 705 (2d Cir. 1989)........................................................................................................ 3 Carter v. Full Serv., Inc., 815 N.Y.S.2d 41 (2006).............................................................................................................. 3 Highl…
…Ghislaine? 17 MS. MENNINGER: Objection, leading and 18 foundation. 19 THE WITNESS : I believe it was five years , 20 2001 to 2006 . 21 BY MS. McCAWLEY: 22 Q. And how many massages did Epstein receive 23 per day on average…
…Co. v. Indem. Ins. Co. of N. Am., No. 3:06-CV-232 (CFD), 2006 WL 1525970 (D. Conn. May 25, 2006) ..................................9 LiButti v. United States, 107 F.3d 110 (2d Cir. 1997).......................................................................................................8 Rules Fed. R. Evid. 404…