…and J. Doe’s repeated assertion that these documents are entitled to only a “slight presumption of access” is directly contradicted by the Second Circuit’s conclusion that “the presumption of access to “materials submitted in connection with, and relevant…
…in balancing privacy and other interests.” To find now that the failure to seek excerpts or object by a Non-Party forfeited their ability to have the Court perform its review function would contradict the plain terms of the Protocol…
…of course, directly contradicts her previous spurious argument that Ms. Maxwell is secreting millions of dollars of assets out of the country. 6 This holds particularly true in this case where the Plaintiff has shown a blatant disregard for confidentiality…
…true purpose behind the instant motion, and wholly contradict the flimflam he has presented to this Court: “My goal is to bring charges against the client and require her to speak in court.”37 Indeed, in over 50 statements to…
…with the aid of British counsel and without having seen Defendant's British law argument, s6bmits an interpretation of British law directly contradicting Defendant's. 4 • • .~ ·f This precarious support provides an insu…
…Mr. Barton drafted the bulk of the statement. That's not true at all. If the Court looks 18 19 -- at the papers cited by the response, there is no contradiction of Mr. Barton's testimony. Mr. Barton said that…
…This illustrates the critical role that these documents were to play in the judicial process and contradicts Maxwell’s assertion that they are either non-judicial documents or negligible judicial documents. Maxwell also asserts that “[i]t is unclear what…
…Barton drafted the bulk 17 of the statement. That's not true at all. If the Court looks 18 at the papers cited by the response, there is no contradiction 19 of Mr. Barton's testimony. Mr. Barton said that…
…critical.” See Burke, 700 F.2d at 77-78.6 To the extent that Maxwell seeks Churcher’s communications with and about Ms. Roberts to find evidence that might contradict or otherwise impeach testimony from Ms. Roberts, it is well…
…of injuring the plaintiff. One who makes a public attack upon another subjects his own motives to discussion. It is a contradiction in terms to say that the one attacked is privileged only to speak the truth, and not to…
Comments