gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.276.0_1.pdf PDF
…the 5 Court I didn't think so, and I didn't think that the trial date 6 was reasonable as a result of what I perceived to be problems 7 going forward with discovery. Counsel on the other side…
…the 5 Court I didn't think so, and I didn't think that the trial date 6 was reasonable as a result of what I perceived to be problems 7 going forward with discovery. Counsel on the other side…
…msg Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's Revised Supplemental Privilege Log dated April 29, 2016 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 156-1 Filed 05/20/16 Page 3 of 26 Log …
…msg Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's Revised Supplemental Privilege Log dated May 27, 2016 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1326-3 Filed 01/04/24 Page 3 of 27 Log …
…msg Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's Revised Supplemental Privilege Log dated May 27, 2016 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-15 Filed 01/03/24 Page 3 of 27 Log …
…2020. (See dkt. no. 1045.) That redacted Decided Motions List is attached hereto. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York April 14, 2020 __________________________________ LORETTA A. PRESKA Senior United States District Judge …
…msg Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's Revised Supplemental Privilege Log dated May 27, 2016 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1320-15 Filed 01/03/24 Page 3 of 27 Log …
…cases Plaintiff Virginia Giuffre's Revised Supplemental Privilege Log dated April 29, 2016 Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 165-1 Filed 05/26/16 Page 3 of 6 Log …
…In an abundance of caution, undersigned counsel notes that the redactions identified in the chart below have been requested in an omnibus letter motion filed in the above-styled proceedings on this date, and thus respectfully requests that the transcript…
…the Court that none are necessary within two weeks of the date of receipt of this Opinion. June 20, 2016, Order at p. 19. Accordingly, attached please find a proposed redacted version of this Court’s Opinion. Dated: July 5…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…Motions re. Depositions Date Filed DE Category Docket Text DECLARATION of Sigrid S. McCawley in Opposition re: 75 MOTION to Compel Responses Motion to Compel – Judicial to Defendant's…
…a deposition date, 17 and we hadn't gotten all of the documents, and we hadn't had a 18 protective order. And Ms. McCawley says -- and this is at page 19 9 of that transcript, your Honor, dated March…
…Pleadings and Related Orders (“Case Management”) 9. Evidence and Motions filed for an Improper Purpose or Subject to a Motion to Strike or Exclude (“Improper Purpose”) Date Filed DE Category Docket Text DECLARATION of Sigrid S.…
…PACER anything that looks like an order, and we 21 can't find in the sealed documents anything that looks like an 22 order at or about that date resolving this motion. 23 So, to the extent that we can…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (Doc.1016)…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…3 Filed 05/20/16 Page 2 of 9 Pottinger Documents Log Email Sent Privilege Page Doc ID Date Email Fro…