…waiver. In any event, whether served or not, Mr. Brunel apparently promised to provide new dates before his deposition date came and went, did not do so, has left the country and not indicated a present intention to return. Given…
…waiver. In any event, whether served or not, Mr. Brunel apparently promised to provide new dates before his deposition date came and went, did not do so, has left the country and not indicated a present intention to return. Given…
…waiver. In any event, whether served or not, Mr. Brunel apparently promised to provide new dates before his deposition date came and went, did not do so, has left the country and not indicated a present intention to return. Given…
…disclosure. The Court will rule on (1) the appropriateness of the proposed disclosure to Mr. Dershowitz and (2) the scope of any disclosure to Mr. Dershowitz at a later date. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York August 31, 2020 …
…2020. (See dkt. no. 1045.) That redacted Decided Motions List is attached hereto. SO ORDERED. Dated: New York, New York April 14, 2020 __________________________________ LORETTA A. PRESKA Senior United States District Judge …
…Plaintiff, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -against- ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: The Court has reviewed the parties’ letters dated August …
…commencing July 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above date, before Leslie Fagin, a Court Reporter and Notary Public in the State of New York. - - - MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES 1200 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10026 …
…motion was taken on submission on that date. Defendant filed a reply on June 6, 2016 . Plaintiff filed her letter motion for l eave to serve three depositions subpoenas by means other than personal service. By Order dated May 27 …
…from 1999-present, but she has produced no email prior to 2009, and still refuses to disclose the email accounts she used prior to that date. Defendant represents to the Court that there is no undisclosed email address, yet in…
…commencing July 22, 2016, 9:04 a.m., on the above date, before Leslie Fagin, a Court Reporter and Notary Public in the State of New York. - - - MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES 1200 Avenue of the Americas New York, New York 10026 …
…accordance with the rules, with argument to be heard on July 7, 2016 (the first Thursday following the completion of briefing) or on a later date convenient for the Court. Dated: June 16, 2016 Respectfully submitted, __/s/ Gregory L. Poe__…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…20-2413-cv Giuffre v. Maxwell USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS ELECTRONICALLY FILED FOR THE SECOND CIRCU…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…Rules of Civil Procedure and (2) should intervention be permitted, for confidential access to sealed judicial records and discovery documents. (See Notice of Ex Parte Motion to Intervene and for Confidential Access to Documents, dated Sept. 1, 2020 [dkt. no…
…Media Company ("Miami Herald"), Intervenors in the above-captioned case, hereby appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit from the Memorandum and Order dated August 24, 2018, and entered in this action on August 27…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…in this matter requires that, after an objection is made to a confidential designation, the party seeking to protect the designation must file a motion within ten business days of the date of the objection. See D.E. 62 at …
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
…that “only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet—along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet’s decisions on those motions—are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches.” Order, dated Dec. 16, 2019 (DE 1016)…
Comments